I bought a Corona plan during DMIT's Christmas event, so now I can make a proper comparison. 
I did my best with the formatting, but there is really no way to optimize the mobile display perfectly; I recommend viewing the charts in landscape mode or on a larger screen. 
Contents
1. Configuration Comparison
2. Evening Peak Single-Thread Speed Tests
3. Return Routes & Network Quality
4. Outbound Routes from Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou - IPv4
5. Outbound Routes from Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou - IPv6
6. Mainland Three-Network Outbound TCP Ping - IPv4
7. Mainland Three-Network Outbound TCP Ping - IPv6
8. International Connectivity
9. IP Quality & Streaming Unlock
10. Performance Tests
11. Summary
1. Configuration Comparison
| Plan |
🇺🇸 BandwagonHOST NODESEEK-MEGABOX-PRO |
🇺🇸 DMIT LAX.AN4.PRO.MALIBU |
🇺🇸 DMIT LAX.AN4.EB.CORONA |
| Location |
United States, Los Angeles |
United States, Los Angeles |
United States, Los Angeles |
| CPU |
2 x AMD EPYC-Genoa vCores |
1 x AMD EPYC 9654 vCore |
1 x AMD EPYC 9654 vCore |
| RAM |
2GB |
1GB |
1GB |
| Disk |
40GB |
20GB |
20GB |
| Traffic |
2TB(two-way billing), suspended after overage |
1TB(two-way billing), rate-limited after overage 2Mbps |
2TB(two-way billing), rate-limited after overage 2Mbps |
| Peak Bandwidth |
2.5Gbps |
1Gbps |
2Gbps |
| IPv4Return |
Telecom CN2GIA/Unicom9929/Mobile CMIN2 |
Telecom/Unicom/Mobile CN2GIA |
Telecom9929/Unicom9929/Mobile CMIN2 |
| IPv6Return |
international route with no mainland China optimization |
Telecom9929/Unicom9929/Mobile CMIN2 |
Telecom9929/Unicom9929/Mobile CMIN2 |
| Network |
1 x IPv4, 1 x /64 IPv6 |
1 x IPv4, 1 x /64 IPv6 |
1 x IPv4, 1 x /64 IPv6 |
| Price |
USD$49.00 |
USD$49.90 |
USD$49.90 |
BandwagonHOST's NODESEEK-MEGABOX-PRO is a co-branded plan with the forum; NODESEEK-BIGGERBOX-PRO uses the same route and is located in BandwagonHOST's DC1. DMIT's LAX.PRO.MALIBU belongs to its Los Angeles Pro product line, while LAX.EB.CORONA belongs to the Los Angeles Eyeball (EB) product line. All three tested models are limited-time promo plans. BandwagonHOST's DC1 does not yet have a corresponding regular-price plan, but DMIT sells regular-price plans on the same Pro/Eyeball routes.
Provider website: BandwagonHOST https://bandwagonhost.com ｜ DMIT https://dmit.io
🔗 Quick Links
Looking GlassSpeed-test Address：[DMIT LAX.PRO] | [DMIT LAX.EB]
Beijing/Shanghai/Guangzhou three-network real-time return latency - Probe: [BandwagonHOST Megabox Pro] | [DMIT Malibu] | [DMIT Corona]
2. Evening Peak Direct Single-Thread Speed Tests
Test Method: single-thread TCP
Speed Test URL: https://speed.cloudflare.com
Latency Check URL: http://www.apple.com/library/test/success.html
Single-thread speed tests reflect real browsing experience better than multi-thread tests, because web pages, video, and games mostly use single-thread connections, while multi-threading is more often used for downloads. Therefore single-thread testing better reflects actual route quality. TCP is used here; optimized routes do not need UDP testing and may even be QoS-limited by carriers.
Rather than only reading the review, you can also visit DMIT's official speed-test address https://lg.dmit.sh to get first-hand experience; BandwagonHOST does not provide an official speed-test address.
From the IPv4 speed results, for China Telecom, Malibu and Megabox Pro are about the same, while Corona has very good speed even on cross-network Telecom, though it sometimes starts slowly. For China Unicom, Megabox Pro's Unicom 9929 is weaker than the two DMIT models: it starts slowly and cannot match their speeds. Interestingly, the charts also include BandwagonHOST DC6/DC9/DC99 results; those all use CN2 cross-network return to Unicom, yet their Unicom performance is better than DC1 (Megabox Pro). For China Mobile, all three are about the same.
For IPv6, BandwagonHOST's IPv6 comes from a v4tunnel without China optimization, so it basically has no speed. Malibu and Corona use the same optimized v6 route, and results for all three networks are similarly good.
All three machines rarely hit 1G in single-thread tests. My guess is that these products have many users and less spare bandwidth, especially since the tests were run during the evening peak. It could also be provider-side or local-carrier rate limiting; some regional carriers limit single-thread US West traffic to 100-200Mbps even on optimized routes. Kernel parameters may have some effect, but probably not much.
| China Telecom - IPv4 |
China Unicom - IPv4 |
China Mobile - IPv4 |
 |
 |
 |
| China Telecom - IPv6 |
China Unicom - IPv6 |
China Mobile - IPv6 |
 |
 |
 |
3. Return Routes & Network Quality
Megabox Pro return: premium routes for all three networks: China Telecom CN2 GIA, China Unicom 10099->9929, China Mobile CMIN2; v6 return is not optimized.
Malibu return: all three networks forced to CN2 GIA; v6 uses China Telecom/Unicom 10099->9929 and China Mobile CMIN2.
Corona return: China Telecom/Unicom 10099->9929, China Mobile CMIN2; v6 also uses China Telecom/Unicom 10099->9929 and China Mobile CMIN2.
bash <(curl -sL https://run.NodeQuality.com)
| 🇺🇸 Megabox Pro |
🇺🇸 Malibu |
🇺🇸 Corona |
 |
 |
 |
bash <(curl -sL https://run.NodeQuality.com)
| 🇺🇸 Megabox Pro |
🇺🇸 Malibu |
🇺🇸 Corona |
 |
 |
 |
4. IPv4 Outbound Routes from Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou (itdog.cn)
Megabox Pro, Malibu, and Corona all use premium IPv4 outbound routes: China Telecom CN2 GIA, China Unicom 9929->10099, and China Mobile CMIN2.
🇺🇸 Megabox Pro
| Location |
China Telecom |
China Unicom |
China Mobile |
| Beijing |
 |
 |
 |
| Shanghai |
 |
 |
 |
| Guangzhou |
 |
 |
 |
🇺🇸 Malibu
| Location |
China Telecom |
China Unicom |
China Mobile |
| Beijing |
 |
 |
 |
| Shanghai |
 |
 |
 |
| Guangzhou |
 |
 |
 |
🇺🇸 Corona
| Location |
China Telecom |
China Unicom |
China Mobile |
| Beijing |
 |
 |
 |
| Shanghai |
 |
 |
 |
| Guangzhou |
 |
 |
 |
5. IPv6 Outbound Routes from Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou (itdog.cn)
IPv6 outbound routes are very different from IPv4.
Megabox Pro's IPv6 has no mainland China optimization. Malibu and Corona have identical IPv6 outbound routes: only China Mobile uses the CMIN2 premium route, while China Telecom and China Unicom IPv6 outbound use their respective backbones. Therefore, for China Unicom users on Malibu (DMIT Pro series), using the v6 9929 return while forcing outbound through the v4 route (9929->10099) may further improve network quality.
🇺🇸 Megabox Pro
| Location |
China Telecom |
China Unicom |
China Mobile |
| Beijing |
 |
 |
 |
| Shanghai |
 |
 |
 |
| Guangzhou |
 |
 |
 |
🇺🇸 Malibu
| Location |
China Telecom |
China Unicom |
China Mobile |
| Beijing |
 |
 |
 |
| Shanghai |
 |
 |
 |
| Guangzhou |
 |
 |
 |
🇺🇸 Corona
| Location |
China Telecom |
China Unicom |
China Mobile |
| Beijing |
 |
 |
 |
| Shanghai |
 |
 |
 |
| Guangzhou |
 |
 |
 |
6. IPv4 Mainland Three-Network Outbound TCP Ping (itdog.cn, 23:00)
During the evening peak, outbound TCP is basically light-green across all three networks, with almost no jitter and 0% packet loss, worthy of an optimized route.
🇺🇸 Megabox Pro
| China Telecom |
China Unicom |
China Mobile |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
🇺🇸 Malibu
| China Telecom |
China Unicom |
China Mobile |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
🇺🇸 Corona
| China Telecom |
China Unicom |
China Mobile |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
7. IPv6 Mainland Three-Network Outbound TCP Ping (itdog.cn, 2025-12-22 23:00)
Megabox Pro's v6 is unoptimized and very jittery. Although Malibu and Corona use direct backbone routes for China Telecom/Unicom v6 outbound, latency, packet loss, and jitter are still very stable.
🇺🇸 Megabox Pro
| China Telecom |
China Unicom |
China Mobile |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
🇺🇸 Malibu
| China Telecom |
China Unicom |
China Mobile |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
🇺🇸 Corona
| China Telecom |
China Unicom |
China Mobile |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
8. International Connectivity
BandwagonHOST Megabox Pro has very large local bandwidth; testing suggests around 10Gbps, though that is not very useful here. Corona did not fully reach its burst 2G local bandwidth. Pulling US West landing nodes is no problem.
The previous BandwagonHOST test used the system's internal DNS (I forgot to check after reinstalling). Thanks to the comments for pointing it out; I removed it and retested, and everything is fine now. 
Web Latency
bash <(wget -qO- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/danger-dream/network-latency-tester/main/latency.sh)
| 🇺🇸 Megabox Pro |
🇺🇸 Malibu |
🇺🇸 Corona |
 |
 |
 |
Malibu and Corona are also a bit different.
| 🇺🇸 Megabox Pro |
🇺🇸 Malibu |
🇺🇸 Corona |
 |
 |
 |
| IPv4 |
IPv4 |
IPv4 |
 |
 |
 |
| IPv6 |
IPv6 |
IPv6 |
International Latency Test (itdog.cn, ping.pe)
| 🇺🇸 Megabox Pro |
🇺🇸 Malibu |
🇺🇸 Corona |
 |
 |
 |
| IPv4 - TCP |
IPv4 - TCP |
IPv4 - TCP |
 |
 |
 |
| IPv6 - ICMPv6 |
IPv6 - ICMPv6 |
IPv6 -ICMPv6 |
Speed Test - iPerf3 TCP IPv4 Single-Thread (single 10-second run, 2025-12-22)
Test Tool: iPerf3
| 🇺🇸 Megabox Pro |
🇺🇸 Malibu |
🇺🇸 Corona |
 |
 |
 |
9. IP Quality & Streaming Unlock
Megabox Pro and Corona unlock roughly the same services. Corona uses a new IP range (69.63.X.X), so its IP risk score is lower for now, though it is expected to rise later.
For popular route-optimized machines, you generally should not expect much from streaming plus AI unlock unless the provider offers DNS unlock. Google geolocation is not a concern for these three products, as all are officially geolocation-locked and will not be sent to China.
bash <(curl -sL https://run.NodeQuality.com)
| 🇺🇸 Megabox Pro |
🇺🇸 Malibu |
🇺🇸 Corona |
 |
 |
 |
bash <(curl -L -s check.unlock.media)
| 🇺🇸 Megabox Pro |
🇺🇸 Malibu |
🇺🇸 Corona |
 |
 |
 |
| IPv4 |
IPv4 |
IPv4 |
 |
 |
 |
| IPv6 |
IPv6 |
IPv6 |
10. Performance Tests
Although Megabox Pro looks like it has twice the configuration of the two DMIT machines, its dual-core CPU score is lower than the single-core scores of the two DMIT models.
bash <(curl -sL https://run.NodeQuality.com)
| 🇺🇸 Megabox Pro |
🇺🇸 Malibu |
🇺🇸 Corona |
 |
 |
 |