Testing the 55 USD Hong Kong plan I won earlier in the Neburst group lottery. ac01

This 55 USD price is actually based on the original 69.9 USD quarterly price plus a limited 20% lottery coupon. Bandwidth is only 500Mbps; if DC switching is implemented later, it should be fairly interesting to play with.

Contents

1. Configuration
2. Node Quality
3. Mainland Three-Network Outbound Route Tests
4. Mainland Three-Network TCP Ping
5. Evening Peak Direct Single-Thread Speed Tests
6. International Connectivity
7. Summary

1. Configuration

Plan 🇭🇰 Neburst S3N-1C1G-Special
Location China, Hong Kong
CPU 1 x AMD EPYC 7Y43 vCores
RAM 1GB
Disk 20GB
Traffic 500GB(out)
Bandwidth 500Mbps
Route Telecom 163PP/Unicom10099/Mobile CMIN2
Network 1 x IPv4, 1 x /64 IPv6
Price Quarterly USD$55.92

Update: Unicom has been changed to 9929 return, but the test data is still 10099<->4837.

Provider website: https://neburst.com
Looking Glass: https://neburst.com/looking-glass

🔗 Quick Links


YABS Node Quality Mixed Benchmark nws.sh Streaming Unlock
[Link] [Link [Link] [Link] [Link]

It is also a member of the Sakura family.

IPv4 IPv6
image

2. Node Quality

bash <(curl -sL https://run.NodeQuality.com)

💻 Basic Information

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 0 hours, 33 minutes
Processor  : AMD EPYC 7Y43 48-Core Processor
CPU cores  : 1 @ 2549.998 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 929.7 MiB
Swap       : 976.5 MiB
Disk       : 21.0 GiB
Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Kernel     : 6.12.57+deb13-cloud-amd64
VM Type    : STANDARD PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

IPv6 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : Neburst LLC
ASN        : Unknown
Host       : Neburst LLC
Location   : Fountain, Colorado (CO)
Country    : United States

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition -):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 281.76 MB/s  (70.4k) | 2.12 GB/s    (33.2k)
Write      | 282.51 MB/s  (70.6k) | 2.14 GB/s    (33.4k)
Total      | 564.28 MB/s (141.0k) | 4.27 GB/s    (66.7k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 2.28 GB/s     (4.4k) | 2.29 GB/s     (2.2k)
Write      | 2.40 GB/s     (4.7k) | 2.45 GB/s     (2.3k)
Total      | 4.69 GB/s     (9.1k) | 4.75 GB/s     (4.6k)

Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 1205                          
Multi Core      | 1096                          
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23987942

 SysBench CPU Test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
---------------------------------
 1 Thread Test (Single Core) Score:          3855 Scores
 SysBench Memory Test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
---------------------------------
 Single-Thread Read Test:          45311.25 MB/s
 Single-Thread Write Test:          26116.87 MB/s

🎬IP Quality


IPv4 IPv6

🌐 Network Quality


IPv4 IPv6

📍Return Routes


Return: China Telecom 163PP, China Unicom 10099->4837, China Mobile CMIN2.

IPv4 IPv6

3. Mainland Three-Network Outbound Route Tests (itdog.cn, 2025-12-21)

Outbound: China Telecom 163, China Unicom 4837->10099, China Mobile CMI.

Location China Telecom China Unicom China Mobile
Beijing
Shanghai
Guangzhou

4. mainland ChinaThree-Network TCP Ping(itdog.cn, 2025-12-21 20:00)

China Telecom China Unicom China Mobile

5. Evening Peak Direct Single-Thread Speed Tests (2025-12-21 21:00-23:00)

Very stable. Single-thread speeds on all three networks basically reach 470Mbps+ at best, and latency is also excellent.

The speed-test charts also include data from comparable 1G-port models. xhj002

*Click the test record links to view speed-test screenshots, including several popular models as references.

Telecom


Node Average Speed Maximum Speed Latency RTT HTTP Latency
ShenzhenTelecom@1Gbps 469.23Mbps 475.42Mbps 12ms 54ms
GuangdongTelecom@1Gbps 468.33Mbps 471.56Mbps 11ms 194ms
Eastern Guangdong Telecom@1Gbps 451.73Mbps 473.89Mbps 25ms 111ms
GuangxiTelecom@1Gbps 267.20Mbps 470.66Mbps 28ms 394ms
HainanTelecom@1Gbps 455.51Mbps 470.72Mbps 21ms 76ms
ShanghaiTelecom@1Gbps 257.01Mbps 472.50Mbps 35ms 111ms
Xi'an Telecom@2Gbps 449.58Mbps 473.40Mbps 50ms 187ms
Xi'an Telecom@1Gbps 64.80Mbps 265.90Mbps 69ms 255ms

[Telecom Speed Test Record]

Unicom


Node Average Speed Maximum Speed Latency RTT HTTP Latency
GuangdongUnicom@2.5Gbps 472.03Mbps 480.52Mbps 17ms 60ms
ChangshaMobile@1Gbps 400.32Mbps 456.62Mbps 23ms 98ms
ShanghaiUnicom@1Gbps 460.97Mbps 472.69Mbps 39ms 127ms
ShaoxingUnicom@1Gbps 421.41Mbps 472.28Mbps 41ms 131ms
LiaoningUnicom@1Gbps 260.55Mbps 414.31Mbps 60ms 481ms
ShanxiUnicom@1Gbps 281.52Mbps 444.70Mbps 58ms 173ms

[Unicom Speed Test Record]

Mobile


Node Average Speed Maximum Speed Latency RTT HTTP Latency
Guangzhou Mobile@1Gbps 417.91Mbps 469.24Mbps 20ms 98ms
Guangxi Mobile@1Gbps 436.94Mbps 476.18Mbps 31ms 106ms
Shanghai Mobile@1Gbps 248.91Mbps 470.08Mbps 39ms 134ms
Lishui Mobile@2Gbps 459.35Mbps 472.05Mbps 42ms 147ms
Jiangsu Mobile@1Gbps 462.41Mbps 477.20Mbps 42ms 438ms
Sichuan Mobile@1Gbps 450.79Mbps 471.98Mbps 62ms 188ms
Hebei Mobile@1Gbps 453.81Mbps 476.17Mbps 52ms 177ms
Shanxi Mobile@1Gbps 370.73Mbps 470.09Mbps 56ms 183ms

[Mobile Speed Test Record]

6. International Connectivity

Within Hong Kong it basically saturates 500Mbps both ways, and performance to Japan and Singapore is also good.

Web Latency


bash <(wget -qO- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/danger-dream/network-latency-tester/main/latency.sh)

To TG DC5 it goes through sg.gs and to TG DC4 it goes through Vodafone; both routes are connected by Telegram, so in theory speeds should be faster.

🇭🇰 Neburst -> 🇸🇬 TG DC5 🇭🇰 Neburst -> 🇳🇱 TG DC4
image image

International TCP Latency Test(itdog.cn)


IPv4 - TCP IPv6 - ICMPv6

Speed Test - iPerf3 TCP IPv4 Single-Thread (single 10-second run, 2025-12-21)


Test Tool: iPerf3
Region Node Average/Max Upload (Mbps) Average/Max Download (Mbps) Latency (ms)
🇭🇰 Hong Kong DMIT T1 479 / 493 550 / 923 0.65
🇭🇰 Hong Kong RFCHOST JINX 479 / 491 550 / 1009 0.67
🇭🇰 Hong Kong RFCHOST CTC 479 / 488 550 / 1008 0.55
🇭🇰 Hong Kong Nube 479 / 491 548 / 1007 0.70
🇭🇰 Hong Kong GreenCloud DC1 479 / 494 550 / 1008 0.69
🇭🇰 Hong Kong GreenCloud DC2 480 / 496 549 / 1002 1.67
🇭🇰 Hong Kong HostHatch 479 / 488 550 / 967 0.72
🇭🇰 Hong Kong YxVM VOL 479 / 494 550 / 1009 0.70
🇭🇰 Hong Kong FxTransit 479 / 487 550 / 1009 0.81
🇭🇰 Hong Kong Hytron 479 / 495 548 / 994 0.77
🇭🇰 Hong Kong Halo STD 479 / 490 540 / 1009 1.58
🇭🇰 Hong Kong Halo Lite 479 / 493 550 / 1005 1.52
🇭🇰 Hong Kong BAGE HKS 479 / 487 549 / 1008 0.53
🇭🇰 Hong Kong BAGE HKL 479 / 490 549 / 1008 0.64
🇭🇰 Hong Kong ClawCloud 480 / 493 550 / 999 2.98
🇭🇰 Hong Kong Servps 479 / 491 550 / 1008 1.20
🇭🇰 Hong Kong Boil HKT 479 / 500 547 / 914 2.80
🇭🇰 Hong Kong Kaze HKBN 479 / 503 548 / 992 3.26
🇹🇼 Taipei Misaka 484 / 531 543 / 968 18.34
🇹🇼 Taichung HiNet 479 / 539 542 / 779 26.22
🇯🇵 Tokyo DMIT T1 476 / 540 532 / 706 50.36
🇯🇵 Tokyo BAGE JP 482 / 540 529 / 731 45.09
🇯🇵 Tokyo BAGE JPS 484 / 549 527 / 768 45.76
🇯🇵 Tokyo Nube 481 / 539 531 / 729 53.78
🇯🇵 Tokyo GreenCloud SB 475 / 541 531 / 733 50.74
🇯🇵 Tokyo GreenCloud IIJ 251 / 526 519 / 969 51.37
🇯🇵 Tokyo DDPS CDN77 484 / 551 532 / 735 47.68
🇯🇵 Tokyo RFCHOST T1 482 / 540 534 / 796 45.20
🇯🇵 Tokyo YxVM VOL 481 / 540 535 / 792 45.65
🇯🇵 Tokyo NNC STD 481 / 542 535 / 800 45.04
🇯🇵 Tokyo FxTransit 485 / 561 534 / 797 45.57
🇯🇵 Tokyo SkylineConnect 477 / 540 530 / 738 50.22
🇰🇷 Seoul HostHatch 475 / 542 528 / 743 60.61
🇸🇬 Singapore RFCHOST T1 483 / 537 538 / 887 30.30
🇸🇬 Singapore BAGE SG 482 / 529 539 / 887 30.01
🇸🇬 Singapore BAGE SGS 481 / 534 540 / 896 30.66
🇸🇬 Singapore GreenCloud DC1 485 / 585 540 / 898 33.05
🇸🇬 Singapore GreenCloud DC2 481 / 541 520 / 805 38.93
🇸🇬 Singapore Nube 483 / 545 539 / 893 31.12
🇸🇬 Singapore SkylineConnect 483 / 563 537 / 878 37.52
🇸🇬 Singapore IDC.Care 482 / 540 536 / 718 36.11
🇻🇳 Hanoi GreenCloud 482 / 542 545 / 949 22.08
🇻🇳 Ho Chi Minh City GreenCloud 0 / 0 533 / 720 48.34
🇮🇳 Mumbai HostDZire 397 / 454 387 / 459 85.70
🇦🇺 Sydney GreenCloud 419 / 540 476 / 683 143.09
🇺🇸 Los Angeles DMIT T1 419 / 540 464 / 732 143.42
🇺🇸 Los Angeles GreenCloud 412 / 540 481 / 697 143.55
🇺🇸 Los Angeles AlphaVPS 421 / 540 481 / 693 143.67
🇺🇸 Los Angeles HostDZire 366 / 541 445 / 781 226.38
🇺🇸 Los Angeles BAGE LA1 419 / 539 485 / 713 143.68
🇺🇸 Los Angeles BAGE LA2 423 / 538 477 / 776 150.10
🇺🇸 Los Angeles RFCHOST T1 414 / 536 147 / 278 149.59
🇺🇸 San Jose HostDZire 412 / 539 473 / 751 154.51
🇺🇸 San Jose GreenCloud 412 / 539 479 / 782 151.54
🇺🇸 San Jose Nube 404 / 539 480 / 733 155.45
🇺🇸 Las Vegas BuyVM 419 / 543 477 / 709 146.04
🇺🇸 Seattle Misaka 428 / 541 490 / 933 129.84
🇺🇸 Seattle AlphaVPS 242 / 440 450 / 790 198.84
🇺🇸 Ogden GreenCloud 412 / 539 476 / 781 149.70
🇺🇸 Salt Lake City BAGE 419 / 540 476 / 808 148.72
🇺🇸 Dallas AlphaVPS 396 / 540 470 / 858 169.21
🇺🇸 Jacksonville GreenCloud 368 / 539 443 / 707 208.79
🇺🇸 Chicago GreenCloud DC1 389 / 541 462 / 930 177.60
🇺🇸 Chicago GreenCloud DC2 352 / 538 457 / 964 221.81
🇺🇸 Ashburn GreenCloud 375 / 539 439 / 751 205.83
🇺🇸 Washington HostDZire 346 / 543 450 / 756 208.42
🇺🇸 New York AlphaVPS 389 / 540 445 / 811 192.52
🇷🇺 Moscow Misaka 88 / 230 120 / 139 163.94
🇩🇪 Frankfurt BAGE 366 / 541 435 / 792 225.26
🇩🇪 Frankfurt GreenCloud 420 / 541 281 / 445 170.46
🇩🇪 Frankfurt BERO 366 / 539 434 / 775 290.44
🇩🇪 Nuremberg Netcup 213 / 353 185 / 233 152.04
🇩🇪 Nuremberg AlphaVPS 394 / 538 463 / 671 147.79
🇳🇱 Amsterdam GreenCloud 354 / 537 433 / 727 244.69
🇨🇭 Zurich Aluy 367 / 538 63 / 143 241.47
🇧🇬 Sofia AlphaVPS 397 / 484 463 / 825 162.54
🇸🇪 Stockholm HostHatch 161 / 261 112 / 164 207.84
🇬🇧 London AlphaVPS 367 / 540 437 / 793 221.24
🇬🇧 Coventry BAGE 316 / 538 403 / 588 223.57
🇬🇧 Coventry GreenCloud 366 / 539 447 / 791 225.60

[Test Record]

7. Summary

A well-rounded machine with no real weak point. Aside from the smaller bandwidth making speed-test screenshots less impressive, it is more than enough for personal use; the three networks are balanced, performance is stable, and international connectivity is excellent.

8. About the Tests

The machines used in this test were purchased at my own expense; results may be time-sensitive.
Kernel parameters of the test machines (/etc/sysctl.conf) are as follows.

fs.file-max = 6815744
net.ipv4.tcp_no_metrics_save=1
net.ipv4.tcp_ecn=0
net.ipv4.tcp_frto=0
net.ipv4.tcp_mtu_probing=0
net.ipv4.tcp_rfc1337=0
net.ipv4.tcp_sack=1
net.ipv4.tcp_fack=1
net.ipv4.tcp_window_scaling=1
net.ipv4.tcp_adv_win_scale=1
net.ipv4.tcp_moderate_rcvbuf=1
net.core.rmem_max=33554432
net.core.wmem_max=33554432
net.ipv4.tcp_rmem=4096 87380 33554432
net.ipv4.tcp_wmem=4096 16384 33554432
net.ipv4.udp_rmem_min=8192
net.ipv4.udp_wmem_min=8192
net.ipv4.ip_forward=1
net.ipv4.conf.all.route_localnet=1
net.ipv4.conf.all.forwarding=1
net.ipv4.conf.default.forwarding=1
net.core.default_qdisc=fq
net.ipv4.tcp_congestion_control=bbr
net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding=1
net.ipv6.conf.default.forwarding=1

9. Acknowledgements

Thanks to "Impart Speed Test“(@Kyoma ) for providing the mainland Chinapublic-interest speed test service