Testing a performance-oriented route VPS I got, to see how it performs xhj004

1. Configuration

Plan 🇭🇰 GoMAMi Turin.Mini
Location China, Hong Kong
CPU 2 x AMD EPYC 9575F vCPU
RAM 4GB
Disk 100GB
Traffic 1000GB(one-way)
Speed 2Gbps
Network 1 x IPv4
Route premium return routes for all three Chinese networks
Price Monthly USD$55.20 / Quarterly USD$155.25 / Yearly USD$579.60

2. NodeQuality

💻 Basic Information

Performance is extremely strong. Compared with the 7763 I have, the 9575F is 123.8% higher in GB5 single-core (1101) and 130% higher in multi-core (2116)

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 18 hours, 3 minutes
Processor  : AMD EPYC 9575F 64-Core Processor
CPU cores  : 2 @ 3299.996 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 3.8 GiB
Swap       : 0.0 KiB
Disk       : 101.0 GiB
Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Kernel     : 6.12.43+deb13-cloud-amd64
VM Type    : STANDARD PC (I440FX + PIIX, 1996)
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline

IPv4 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : Spare and Care Engineers Private Limited
ASN        : AS132729 SPARE AND CARE ENGINEERS PRIVATE LIMITED
Host       : Hong Kong Broadband Network Limited
Location   : Ha Kwai Chung, Kwai Tsing (NKT)
Country    : Hong Kong

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition -):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 609.54 MB/s (152.3k) | 5.32 GB/s    (83.1k)
Write      | 611.15 MB/s (152.7k) | 5.35 GB/s    (83.5k)
Total      | 1.22 GB/s   (305.1k) | 10.67 GB/s  (166.7k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 6.11 GB/s    (11.9k) | 6.61 GB/s     (6.4k)
Write      | 6.44 GB/s    (12.5k) | 7.05 GB/s     (6.8k)
Total      | 12.55 GB/s   (24.5k) | 13.66 GB/s   (13.3k)

Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 2465                          
Multi Core      | 4870                          
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23863433

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 3202                          
Multi Core      | 5911                          
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/14639521

 SysBench CPU Test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
---------------------------------
 1 thread test (single-core) score:          6229 Scores
 2 thread test (multi-core) score:          12438 Scores
 SysBench Memory Test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
---------------------------------
 Single-thread read test:          96293.13 MB/s
 Single-thread write test:          37029.43 MB/s

Geekbench 6 results are provided by YABS

curl -sL https://yabs.sh | bash -s -- -i -f -6

🎬 IP Quality

Announced IP; geolocation, unlocking, and risk score are all good

image

🌐 Network Quality

image

📍 Return Routes

Premium return routes for all three Chinese networks

China Telecom China Unicom China Mobile
CN2GIA 10099->9929 CMIN2

image

3. Outbound Routes (itdog.cn)

Outbound uses direct backbone routes

China Telecom China Unicom China Mobile
163 4837->10099 CMI
Location China Telecom China Unicom China Mobile
Beijing
Shanghai
Guangzhou

4. TCP-PING (itdog.cn, 2025-10-26 21:00)

5. Streaming Unlock

bash <(curl -L -s check.unlock.media)

6. Major website & DNS latency tests

bash <(wget -qO- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Cd1s/network-latency-tester/main/latency.sh)
  • Website test
Ping Real connection
  • DNS test
Ping DNS resolution

7. Proxy Speed Test (2025-10-24 22:00-23:00)

Tested during Friday evening peak

  • Single-thread
Node Average speed(Mbps) Maximum speed(Mbps) TLS RTT(ms)
Shenzhen Telecom@2Gbps (Haitun) 1256 1454 11
Shanghai Telecom@1Gbps (Impart) 639 700 53
Foshan Unicom@2.3Gbps (Haitun) 1358 1511 13
Guangdong Unicom@2.5Gbps (Impart) 1190 1420 27
Shanghai Unicom9929@2.5Gbps(Impart) 34 98 51
Shanghai Unicom@1Gbps (Impart) 589 626 52
Beijing Unicom9929@2.5Gbps (Impart) 122 164 86
Hangzhou Mobile@2Gbps (Haitun) 743 806 61
ShanghaiVolcengine Cloud@2Gbps (Impart) 758 808 44
Beijing Education network@1Gbps (Impart) 375 391 67
HangzhouIX@20Gbps (Impart) 273 324 49
  • Multi-thread
Node Average speed(Mbps) Maximum speed(Mbps) TLS RTT(ms)
Shenzhen Telecom@2Gbps (Haitun) 1666 1958 88
Shanghai Telecom@1Gbps (Impart) 914 943 48
Foshan Unicom@2.3Gbps (Haitun) 1840 1910 13
Guangdong Unicom@2.5Gbps (Impart) 1890 1940 26
Shanghai Unicom9929@2.5Gbps (Impart) 1180 1340 53
Shanghai Unicom@1Gbps (Impart) 894 926 88
Beijing Unicom9929@2.5Gbps (Impart) 975 1210 55
Hangzhou Mobile@2Gbps (Haitun) 1793 1942 66
ShanghaiVolcengine Cloud@2Gbps (Impart) 1360 1900 50
Beijing Education network@1Gbps (Impart) 843 930 75
HangzhouIX@20Gbps (Impart) 377 1090 49

8. Speedtest multi-thread speed test

curl -sL nws.sh | bash
---------------------------------- nws.sh ---------------------------------
      A simple script to bench network performance using speedtest-cli     
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Version            : v2025.10.10
 Global Speedtest   : wget -qO- nws.sh | bash
 Region Speedtest   : wget -qO- nws.sh | bash -s -- -r <region>
 Ping & Routing     : wget -qO- nws.sh | bash -s -- -rt <region>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Speedtest.net (Region: GLOBAL)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Location         Latency     Loss    DL Speed       UP Speed       Server      

 ISP: NEXTHOP 

 Nearest          0.99 ms     0.0%    1925.44 Mbps   1999.38 Mbps   FPT Telecom - Hong Kong 

 Bangalore, IN    70.09 ms    0.0%    1911.88 Mbps   1127.23 Mbps   Bharti Airtel Ltd - Bangalore 
 Chennai, IN      65.22 ms    0.0%    1860.61 Mbps   1259.45 Mbps   RailTel Corporation of India Ltd - Chennai 
 Mumbai, IN       186.50 ms   0.0%    1815.84 Mbps   407.39 Mbps    Melbicom - Mumbai 

 Seattle, US      146.01 ms   N/A     1068.41 Mbps   561.92 Mbps    Comcast - Seattle, WA 
 Los Angeles, US  143.97 ms   0.0%    1282.17 Mbps   386.23 Mbps    ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA 
 Dallas, US       171.02 ms   0.0%    1256.13 Mbps   461.76 Mbps    Hivelocity - Dallas, TX 
 Miami, US        210.29 ms   0.0%    1109.67 Mbps   394.56 Mbps    Frontier - Miami, FL 
 New York, US     181.92 ms   0.0%    1781.66 Mbps   462.35 Mbps    GSL Networks - New York, NY 
 Toronto, CA      234.13 ms   0.0%    1123.34 Mbps   347.86 Mbps    Rogers - Toronto, ON 
 Mexico City, MX  401.67 ms   N/A     478.93 Mbps    220.67 Mbps    INFINITUM - Ciudad de México 

 London, UK       179.40 ms   0.0%    1778.03 Mbps   455.33 Mbps    VeloxServ Communications - London 
 Amsterdam, NL    183.22 ms   0.0%    1816.99 Mbps   457.41 Mbps    31173 Services AB - Amsterdam 
 Paris, FR        193.53 ms   0.0%    1840.04 Mbps   438.55 Mbps    Scaleway - Paris 
 Frankfurt, DE    204.07 ms   0.0%    879.17 Mbps    411.46 Mbps    Clouvider Ltd - Frankfurt am Main 
 Warsaw, PL       247.82 ms   0.0%    1522.26 Mbps   335.50 Mbps    Play - Warszawa 
 Bucharest, RO    203.77 ms   0.0%    10.36 Mbps     4.56 Mbps      Vodafone Romania Mobile - Bucharest - Bucharest 
 Moscow, RU       167.38 ms   0.0%    1659.13 Mbps   503.12 Mbps    Misaka Network, Inc. - Moscow 

 Jeddah, SA       222.41 ms   0.0%    1661.75 Mbps   374.16 Mbps    Saudi Telecom Company 
 Dubai, AE        112.19 ms   0.0%    1958.12 Mbps   406.93 Mbps    e& UAE - Dubai 
 Istanbul, TR     298.64 ms   0.0%    1476.88 Mbps   263.57 Mbps    Turkcell - Istanbul 
 Tehran, IR       529.39 ms   0.0%    678.06 Mbps    260.56 Mbps    Irancell - Tehran 
 Cairo, EG        212.74 ms   0.0%    1292.60 Mbps   356.62 Mbps    Telecom Egypt - Cairo 

 Tokyo, JP        46.17 ms    0.7%    1852.23 Mbps   1811.73 Mbps   fdcservers.net - Tokyo 
 Shanghai, CU-CN  FAILED                                                        
 Hong Kong, CN    0.56 ms     0.0%    1910.52 Mbps   1778.07 Mbps   Misaka Network, Inc. - Hong Kong 
 Singapore, SG    39.97 ms    0.0%    1910.33 Mbps   2106.74 Mbps   ViewQwest - Singapore 
 Jakarta, ID      51.67 ms    0.0%    1909.46 Mbps   1609.19 Mbps   PT Solnet Indonesia - Jakarta 

 Sydney, AU       122.04 ms   0.0%    1931.40 Mbps   690.32 Mbps    Aussie Broadband - Sydney 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Avg DL Speed       : 1489.34 Mbps
 Avg UL Speed       : 710.45 Mbps

 Total DL Data      : 58.21 GB
 Total UL Data      : 27.75 GB
 Total Data         : 85.96 GB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Duration           : 14 min 27 sec
 System Time        : 24/10/2025 - 20:29:14 CST
 Total Script Runs  : 411747
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Result             : https://result.nws.sh/r/1761308116_94RE5V_GLOBAL.txt
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

9. iPerf3 TCP single-thread speed test (single 30-second test, 2025-10-26 14:00-15:00)

Full speed within Hong Kong, and international connectivity is also good

  • 🇭🇰 Local
Peer Download from peer(Mbps) Retransmits Upload to peer(Mbps) Retransmits Average latency(ms)
🇭🇰 Hong Kong DMIT T1 @4Gbps 1880 3605 2060 588690 0.479
🇭🇰 Hong Kong RFC T1 JINX 1870 0 2070 890643 0.442
🇭🇰 Hong Kong RFC T1 CTC 1910 663 2070 904682 0.342
🇭🇰 Hong Kong GreenCloud DC1 (xTom) @10Gbps 1840 7080 2070 818638 0.527
🇭🇰 Hong Kong GreenCloud DC2 (Leaseweb) @10Gbps 1850 5986 2070 836274 0.397
🇭🇰 Hong Kong NNC (Akari) 1840 3424 2060 608147 0.519
🇭🇰 Hong Kong BAGE HKS (CTC) @1Gbps 1000 219015 988 0 0.440
🇭🇰 Hong Kong BAGE HKL (Hytron) @1Gbps 1030 511135 916 396237 0.578
🇭🇰 Hong Kong Claw Intl @1Gbps 1030 31075 1000 230934 2.284
🇭🇰 Hong Kong Servps (Zenlayer) @1Gbps 1030 234797 914 0 1.051
🇭🇰 Hong Kong Kaze HKBN @2.5Gbps 1860 17293 2060 161716 3.420
🇭🇰 Hong Kong Boil HKT @1Gbps 819 3815 863 67 2.886
  • 🌏 Asia-Pacific
Peer Download from peer(Mbps) Retransmits Upload to peer(Mbps) Retransmits Average latency(ms)
🇹🇼 Taipei Misaka 1120 1 779 415 19.834
🇹🇼 Taipei NNC (Akari) 1370 90 1380 0 16.134
🇹🇼 Taichung Boil HiNet @777Mbps 622 254 418 0 24.384
🇯🇵 Tokyo DMIT T1 @4Gbps 481 0 490 0 45.687
🇯🇵 Tokyo RFC JP1T1 496 0 492 0 45.130
🇯🇵 Tokyo BAGE JP (GSL) @5Gbps 480 8 485 0 45.635
🇯🇵 Tokyo BAGE JPS (CTC) @5Gbps 692 0 477 0 46.012
🇯🇵 Tokyo GreenCloud Softbank (xTom) @10Gbps 474 0 476 0 46.168
🇯🇵 Tokyo GreenCloud IIJ (xTom) @10Gbps 467 450 432 13223 46.563
🇯🇵 Tokyo DDPS (CDN77) @10Gbps 474 0 481 0 46.477
🇯🇵 Tokyo AWS Lightsail @1Gbps 357 3 362 7 49.427
🇸🇬 Singapore RFC T1 597 0 731 0 30.235
🇸🇬 Singapore BAGE SG (GSL) @5Gbps 433 4000 595 28 37.246
🇸🇬 Singapore BAGE SGS (CTC) @5Gbps 729 4 726 0 30.418
🇸🇬 Singapore LegendVPS (CTC) @1Gbps 612 0 634 446 30.176
🇸🇬 Singapore IDC.Care (Singtel) @1Gbps 594 0 591 0 37.502
🇸🇬 Singapore AWS Lightsail @1Gbps 452 0 391 0 45.467
  • 🌎 International
Peer Download from peer(Mbps) Retransmits Upload to peer(Mbps) Retransmits Average latency(ms)
🇺🇸 Los Angeles DMIT T1 @4Gbps 146 0 144 0 143.172
🇺🇸 Los Angeles RFC T1 118 0 90.2 0 143.816
🇺🇸 Los Angeles BAGE LA1 (GSL) @1Gbps 144 0 139 895 143.356
🇺🇸 Los Angeles BAGE LA2 (FiberState) @1Gbps 139 0 134 608 148.038
🇺🇸 Los Angeles BAGE LA3 (WebNX) @1Gbps 143 0 144 0 143.546
🇺🇸 Los Angeles ZGO (Kurun) @1Gbps 109 50 99.4 2184 144.867
🇺🇸 San Francisco HostDZire (Leaseweb) @10Gbps 136 0 137 0 152.796
🇺🇸 Salt Lake City BAGE (FiberState) @1Gbps 79.5 17 70.8 3 245.287
🇩🇪 Frankfurt BAGE (dataforest) @5Gbps 109 0 108 0 185.902
🇩🇪 Nuremberg Netcup @1Gbps 149 0 112 13 179.145
🇬🇧 London Yunyoo (Scaleblade) @3Gbps 76 0 56.5 0 234.847
🇬🇧 Coventry BAGE (Pebble) @1Gbps 96.1 0 86.9 1278 193.644
🇮🇳 Mumbai HostDZire @10Gbps 91.3 360 93.2 0 213.429

*During the first HiNet test, I found severe throttling and drops (limited to 8Mbps). I immediately retested other Hong Kong machines and did not see the issue; five minutes later I could not reproduce it. Cause unknown.

10. Summary

A 2Gbps port on an optimized route is very nice. Performance is extremely strong, suitable for websites or upgrading to host game servers. There are no obvious weaknesses. Pricing is high, and if used purely as a proxy, the performance is serious overkill ac01

11. About The Tests

The "GoMAMi Turin Mini" in this article was provided by the merchant for testing. These results do not guarantee retail-machine performance. All other machines participating in the tests (including all iPerf3 peers) were purchased at my own expense; TCP tuning was limited to enabling BBR+FQ, with all other parameters left at defaults; results may be time-sensitive

12. Acknowledgements

Thanks to GoMAMi for providing the "GoMAMi Turin Mini" test machine; thanks to "Impart Speedtest"(@Kyoma) and "Haitun Speedtest" for providing public-benefit speed testing services