Testing the new Singapore machine; it can be read alongside the other V.PS SG article for comparison
Contents
1. Configuration
2. Node Quality
3. Mainland Three-Network Outbound Route Tests
4. Mainland Three-Network TCP Ping
5. Evening Peak Speed Tests
6. International Connectivity
7. Summary
1. Configuration
| Plan | 🇸🇬 GoMAMi SIN.Pulse.Mini |
|---|---|
| Location | Singapore |
| CPU | 2 x AMD EPYC 7663 vCPU |
| RAM | 4GB |
| Disk | 60GB |
| Traffic | 1TB(out) |
| Route | premium return route for each network |
| Port Speed | 1Gbps |
| Network | 1 x IPv4 |
| Price | Monthly USD$39.20 |
🔗 Quick Links
| YABS | Node Quality | Mixed Benchmark | nws.sh | Streaming Unlock |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Link] | [Link] | [Link] | [Link] | [Link] |
2. Node Quality
bash <(curl -sL https://run.NodeQuality.com)
💻 Basic Information
Performance is very good.
Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime : 0 days, 6 hours, 47 minutes
Processor : AMD EPYC 7663 56-Core Processor
CPU cores : 2 @ 1999.999 MHz
AES-NI : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM : 3.8 GiB
Swap : 0.0 KiB
Disk : 61.0 GiB
Distro : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Kernel : 6.12.57+deb13-cloud-amd64
VM Type : STANDARD PC (I440FX + PIIX, 1996)
IPv4/IPv6 : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline
IPv4 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP : Not Bad ISP
ASN : AS9999 Not Bad ISP
Host : Ipxo
Location : Singapore, North West (03)
Country : Singapore
fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition -):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k (IOPS) | 64k (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 353.24 MB/s (88.3k) | 1.45 GB/s (22.6k)
Write | 354.17 MB/s (88.5k) | 1.46 GB/s (22.8k)
Total | 707.42 MB/s (176.8k) | 2.91 GB/s (45.5k)
| |
Block Size | 512k (IOPS) | 1m (IOPS)
------ | --- ---- | ---- ----
Read | 1.62 GB/s (3.1k) | 1.72 GB/s (1.6k)
Write | 1.70 GB/s (3.3k) | 1.83 GB/s (1.7k)
Total | 3.32 GB/s (6.4k) | 3.56 GB/s (3.4k)
Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test | Value
|
Single Core | 1263
Multi Core | 2442
Full Test | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23953763
SysBench CPU Test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
---------------------------------
1 Thread Test (Single Core) Score: 3860 Scores
2 Thread Test (Multi Core) Score: 7683 Scores
SysBench Memory Test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
---------------------------------
Single-Thread Read Test: 48045.84 MB/s
Single-Thread Write Test: 27597.25 MB/s
🎬IP Quality
🌐 Network Quality
📍Return Routes
Each network uses its own premium return route: China Telecom CN2 GIA, China Unicom 9929, and China Mobile CMIN2.
3. Mainland Three-Network Outbound Route Tests (itdog.cn)
Outbound traffic on all three networks uses their respective backbone routes rather than premium routes: China Telecom 163, China Unicom 4837, and China Mobile CMI.
| Location | China Telecom | China Unicom | China Mobile |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beijing | |||
| Shanghai | |||
| Guangzhou |
4. mainland ChinaThree-Network TCP Ping(itdog.cn, 2025-12-06 20:00)
China Telecom is very stable, with slight jitter and packet loss in a few regions; China Unicom is also very stable.
For China Mobile, although outbound also uses CMI, this side is more stable than V.PS SG.
| China Telecom | China Unicom | China Mobile |
|---|---|---|
5. Evening Peak Proxy Speed Tests(2025-12-06 22:00)
All three networks are fairly balanced, with good speed and latency. China Telecom is slightly slower than V.PS and not especially stable; China Unicom is good, and China Mobile is much better than V.PS cross-network CN2.
Telecom
| Node | Average Speed | Maximum Speed | TLS RTT |
|---|---|---|---|
| ShenzhenTelecom@1Gbps | 449.61Mbps | 723.77Mbps | 59ms |
| GuangdongTelecom@1Gbps | 437.79Mbps | 831.50Mbps | 53ms |
| Eastern Guangdong Telecom@1Gbps | 602.32Mbps | 694.89Mbps | 73ms |
| GuangxiTelecom@1Gbps | 282.34Mbps | 404.11Mbps | 75ms |
| HainanTelecom@1Gbps | 208.78Mbps | 324.48Mbps | 74ms |
| ShanghaiTelecom@1Gbps | 258.55Mbps | 653.35Mbps | 64ms |
| Ningbo Telecom@1Gbps | 436.07Mbps | 792.11Mbps | 99ms |
| WenzhouTelecom@1Gbps | 195.52Mbps | 373.52Mbps | 68ms |
| Xi'an Telecom@1Gbps | 306.23Mbps | 742.52Mbps | 88ms |
Unicom
| Node | Average Speed | Maximum Speed | TLS RTT |
|---|---|---|---|
| GuangdongUnicom@1Gbps | 606.47Mbps | 682.09Mbps | 43ms |
| GuangdongUnicom@2.5Gbps | 707.47Mbps | 1.07Gbps | 43ms |
| ShanghaiUnicom@1Gbps | 755.43Mbps | 905.54Mbps | 76ms |
| ShaoxingUnicom@1Gbps | 448.19Mbps | 505.45Mbps | 67ms |
| ShandongUnicom@1Gbps | 673.14Mbps | 961.74Mbps | 78ms |
| ShanxiUnicom@1Gbps | 696.37Mbps | 882.84Mbps | 79ms |
| HebeiUnicom@1Gbps | 397.85Mbps | 437.10Mbps | 77ms |
| LiaoningUnicom@1Gbps | 207.61Mbps | 305.68Mbps | 86ms |
Mobile
| Node | Average Speed | Maximum Speed | TLS RTT |
|---|---|---|---|
| Guangzhou Mobile@1Gbps | 309.04Mbps | 446.02Mbps | 54ms |
| Guangxi Mobile@1Gbps | 636.87Mbps | 785.41Mbps | 66ms |
| Shanghai Mobile@1Gbps | 620.35Mbps | 737.77Mbps | 70ms |
| Lishui Mobile@1Gbps | 699.61Mbps | 974.89Mbps | 80ms |
| Jiangsu Mobile@1Gbps | 215.40Mbps | 352.69Mbps | 74ms |
| Hebei Mobile@1Gbps | 577.96Mbps | 907.80Mbps | 83ms |
| Northeast China Mobile@1Gbps | 558.76Mbps | 810.65Mbps | 104ms |
| Shanxi Mobile@1Gbps | 293.86Mbps | 366.36Mbps | 89ms |
| Sichuan Mobile@1Gbps | 290.71Mbps | 380.78Mbps | 87ms |
6. International Connectivity
Local latency is good. Download is just shy of saturating the 1G port, and there are no real issues.
| Region | Node | Average/Max Upload (Mbps) | Average/Max Download (Mbps) | Latency (ms) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🇸🇬 Singapore | RFCHOST T1 | 1094 / 2024 | 955 / 957 | 0.56 |
| 🇸🇬 Singapore | BAGE SG | 1105 / 2066 | 953 / 956 | 0.67 |
| 🇸🇬 Singapore | BAGE SGS | 1105 / 2075 | 955 / 958 | 0.87 |
| 🇸🇬 Singapore | GreenCloud DC1 | 1107 / 2093 | 954 / 956 | 0.95 |
| 🇸🇬 Singapore | GreenCloud DC2 | 1110 / 2132 | 955 / 958 | 1.28 |
| 🇸🇬 Singapore | Nube | 1102 / 2039 | 955 / 958 | 2.08 |
| 🇸🇬 Singapore | SkylineConnect | 1107 / 2093 | 955 / 958 | 0.76 |
| 🇸🇬 Singapore | IDC.Care | 904 / 1008 | 900 / 956 | 0.98 |
| 🇻🇳 Hanoi | GreenCloud | 1072 / 1861 | 932 / 956 | 45.64 |
| 🇻🇳 Ho Chi Minh City | GreenCloud | 1083 / 1874 | 933 / 995 | 35.17 |
| 🇮🇳 Mumbai | HostDZire | 421 / 489 | 407 / 515 | 53.72 |
| 🇦🇺 Sydney | GreenCloud | 684 / 820 | 800 / 956 | 165.27 |
| 🇺🇸 Los Angeles | DMIT T1 | 608 / 817 | 448 / 750 | 164.59 |
| 🇺🇸 Los Angeles | GreenCloud | 905 / 1092 | 790 / 943 | 164.72 |
| 🇺🇸 Los Angeles | AlphaVPS | 906 / 1106 | 783 / 956 | 164.34 |
| 🇺🇸 Los Angeles | BAGE LA1 | 826 / 1019 | 629 / 930 | 164.25 |
| 🇺🇸 Los Angeles | BAGE LA2 | 846 / 1077 | 708 / 956 | 164.39 |
| 🇺🇸 Los Angeles | RFCHOST T1 | 633 / 818 | 591 / 903 | 182.55 |
| 🇺🇸 San Jose | HostDZire | 851 / 1091 | 653 / 785 | 174.09 |
| 🇺🇸 San Jose | GreenCloud | 847 / 1099 | 790 / 956 | 174.03 |
| 🇺🇸 San Jose | Nube | 861 / 1092 | 797 / 954 | 166.14 |
| 🇺🇸 Seattle | Misaka | 953 / 1200 | 650 / 888 | 148.28 |
| 🇺🇸 Seattle | AlphaVPS | 946 / 1270 | 691 / 924 | 147.49 |
| 🇺🇸 Ogden | GreenCloud | 565 / 829 | 321 / 546 | 232.76 |
| 🇺🇸 Salt Lake City | BAGE | 542 / 819 | 72 / 117 | 183.38 |
| 🇺🇸 Dallas | AlphaVPS | 656 / 830 | 658 / 829 | 206.17 |
| 🇺🇸 Jacksonville | GreenCloud | 640 / 820 | 325 / 405 | 219.78 |
| 🇺🇸 Chicago | GreenCloud DC1 | 489 / 734 | 55 / 149 | 204.50 |
| 🇺🇸 Chicago | GreenCloud DC2 | 770 / 996 | 759 / 937 | 188.03 |
| 🇺🇸 Ashburn | GreenCloud | 473 / 735 | 319 / 425 | 209.11 |
| 🇺🇸 New York | AlphaVPS | 549 / 724 | 581 / 753 | 226.66 |
| 🇩🇪 Frankfurt | BAGE | 617 / 827 | 603 / 792 | 230.55 |
| 🇩🇪 Frankfurt | GreenCloud | 603 / 820 | 644 / 822 | 215.62 |
| 🇩🇪 Frankfurt | Nube | 885 / 1092 | 749 / 956 | 167.54 |
| 🇩🇪 Frankfurt | BERO | 874 / 1086 | 792 / 956 | 161.83 |
| 🇩🇪 Nuremberg | Netcup | 547 / 815 | 424 / 798 | 223.05 |
| 🇩🇪 Nuremberg | AlphaVPS | 904 / 1182 | 636 / 883 | 151.24 |
| 🇳🇱 Amsterdam | GreenCloud | 513 / 633 | 654 / 836 | 213.09 |
| 🇨🇭 Zurich | Aluy | 947 / 1264 | 681 / 941 | 145.01 |
| 🇧🇬 Sofia | AlphaVPS | 292 / 400 | 777 / 931 | 164.98 |
| 🇬🇧 London | AlphaVPS | 737 / 918 | 711 / 956 | 159.15 |
| 🇬🇧 Coventry | BAGE | 241 / 414 | 418 / 710 | 160.95 |
| 🇬🇧 Coventry | GreenCloud | 785 / 995 | 534 / 647 | 186.05 |
7. Summary
The three networks are relatively balanced, with China Telecom slightly weaker. Both speed and latency are excellent, and local connectivity has no issues. By per-unit traffic cost it is cheaper than V.PS at 244/378/515 EUR per year, but for individual users it is still a relatively expensive machine.
If you need both Hong Kong and Singapore, you can actually buy a Hong Kong CN2 / three-network optimized / Hong Kong outbound dedicated-line machine, then connect it to a Singapore landing node with good Hong Kong-Singapore connectivity. That gives you both speed and value, and costs much less than keeping optimized machines in both Hong Kong and Singapore.
8. About the Tests
The machines used in this test, including all machines used for iPerf3 speed tests, were purchased at my own expense; results may be time-sensitive.
Kernel parameters of the test machines (/etc/sysctl.conf) are as follows.
fs.file-max = 6815744
net.ipv4.tcp_no_metrics_save=1
net.ipv4.tcp_ecn=0
net.ipv4.tcp_frto=0
net.ipv4.tcp_mtu_probing=0
net.ipv4.tcp_rfc1337=0
net.ipv4.tcp_sack=1
net.ipv4.tcp_fack=1
net.ipv4.tcp_window_scaling=1
net.ipv4.tcp_adv_win_scale=1
net.ipv4.tcp_moderate_rcvbuf=1
net.core.rmem_max=33554432
net.core.wmem_max=33554432
net.ipv4.tcp_rmem=4096 87380 33554432
net.ipv4.tcp_wmem=4096 16384 33554432
net.ipv4.udp_rmem_min=8192
net.ipv4.udp_wmem_min=8192
net.ipv4.ip_forward=1
net.ipv4.conf.all.route_localnet=1
net.ipv4.conf.all.forwarding=1
net.ipv4.conf.default.forwarding=1
net.core.default_qdisc=fq
net.ipv4.tcp_congestion_control=bbr
net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding=1
net.ipv6.conf.default.forwarding=1
9. Acknowledgements
Thanks to "Impart Speed Test“(@Kyoma ) for providing the mainland Chinapublic-interest speed test service