Testing the new Singapore machine; it can be read alongside the other V.PS SG article for comparison

Contents

1. Configuration
2. Node Quality
3. Mainland Three-Network Outbound Route Tests
4. Mainland Three-Network TCP Ping
5. Evening Peak Speed Tests
6. International Connectivity
7. Summary

1. Configuration

Plan 🇸🇬 GoMAMi SIN.Pulse.Mini
Location Singapore
CPU 2 x AMD EPYC 7663 vCPU
RAM 4GB
Disk 60GB
Traffic 1TB(out)
Route premium return route for each network
Port Speed 1Gbps
Network 1 x IPv4
Price Monthly USD$39.20

🔗 Quick Links

YABS Node Quality Mixed Benchmark nws.sh Streaming Unlock
[Link] [Link] [Link] [Link] [Link]

2. Node Quality

bash <(curl -sL https://run.NodeQuality.com)

💻 Basic Information


Performance is very good.

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 6 hours, 47 minutes
Processor  : AMD EPYC 7663 56-Core Processor
CPU cores  : 2 @ 1999.999 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 3.8 GiB
Swap       : 0.0 KiB
Disk       : 61.0 GiB
Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Kernel     : 6.12.57+deb13-cloud-amd64
VM Type    : STANDARD PC (I440FX + PIIX, 1996)
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline

IPv4 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : Not Bad ISP
ASN        : AS9999 Not Bad ISP
Host       : Ipxo
Location   : Singapore, North West (03)
Country    : Singapore

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition -):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 353.24 MB/s  (88.3k) | 1.45 GB/s    (22.6k)
Write      | 354.17 MB/s  (88.5k) | 1.46 GB/s    (22.8k)
Total      | 707.42 MB/s (176.8k) | 2.91 GB/s    (45.5k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 1.62 GB/s     (3.1k) | 1.72 GB/s     (1.6k)
Write      | 1.70 GB/s     (3.3k) | 1.83 GB/s     (1.7k)
Total      | 3.32 GB/s     (6.4k) | 3.56 GB/s     (3.4k)

Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 1263                          
Multi Core      | 2442                          
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23953763

 SysBench CPU Test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
---------------------------------
 1 Thread Test (Single Core) Score:          3860 Scores
 2 Thread Test (Multi Core) Score:          7683 Scores
 SysBench Memory Test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
---------------------------------
 Single-Thread Read Test:          48045.84 MB/s
 Single-Thread Write Test:          27597.25 MB/s

🎬IP Quality


image

🌐 Network Quality


image

📍Return Routes


Each network uses its own premium return route: China Telecom CN2 GIA, China Unicom 9929, and China Mobile CMIN2.

image

3. Mainland Three-Network Outbound Route Tests (itdog.cn

Outbound traffic on all three networks uses their respective backbone routes rather than premium routes: China Telecom 163, China Unicom 4837, and China Mobile CMI.

Location China Telecom China Unicom China Mobile
Beijing
Shanghai
Guangzhou

4. mainland ChinaThree-Network TCP Ping(itdog.cn, 2025-12-06 20:00)

China Telecom is very stable, with slight jitter and packet loss in a few regions; China Unicom is also very stable.
For China Mobile, although outbound also uses CMI, this side is more stable than V.PS SG.

China Telecom China Unicom China Mobile

5. Evening Peak Proxy Speed Tests(2025-12-06 22:00)

All three networks are fairly balanced, with good speed and latency. China Telecom is slightly slower than V.PS and not especially stable; China Unicom is good, and China Mobile is much better than V.PS cross-network CN2.

Telecom


Node Average Speed Maximum Speed TLS RTT
ShenzhenTelecom@1Gbps 449.61Mbps 723.77Mbps 59ms
GuangdongTelecom@1Gbps 437.79Mbps 831.50Mbps 53ms
Eastern Guangdong Telecom@1Gbps 602.32Mbps 694.89Mbps 73ms
GuangxiTelecom@1Gbps 282.34Mbps 404.11Mbps 75ms
HainanTelecom@1Gbps 208.78Mbps 324.48Mbps 74ms
ShanghaiTelecom@1Gbps 258.55Mbps 653.35Mbps 64ms
Ningbo Telecom@1Gbps 436.07Mbps 792.11Mbps 99ms
WenzhouTelecom@1Gbps 195.52Mbps 373.52Mbps 68ms
Xi'an Telecom@1Gbps 306.23Mbps 742.52Mbps 88ms

[Telecom Speed Test Record]

Unicom


Node Average Speed Maximum Speed TLS RTT
GuangdongUnicom@1Gbps 606.47Mbps 682.09Mbps 43ms
GuangdongUnicom@2.5Gbps 707.47Mbps 1.07Gbps 43ms
ShanghaiUnicom@1Gbps 755.43Mbps 905.54Mbps 76ms
ShaoxingUnicom@1Gbps 448.19Mbps 505.45Mbps 67ms
ShandongUnicom@1Gbps 673.14Mbps 961.74Mbps 78ms
ShanxiUnicom@1Gbps 696.37Mbps 882.84Mbps 79ms
HebeiUnicom@1Gbps 397.85Mbps 437.10Mbps 77ms
LiaoningUnicom@1Gbps 207.61Mbps 305.68Mbps 86ms

[Unicom Speed Test Record]

Mobile


Node Average Speed Maximum Speed TLS RTT
Guangzhou Mobile@1Gbps 309.04Mbps 446.02Mbps 54ms
Guangxi Mobile@1Gbps 636.87Mbps 785.41Mbps 66ms
Shanghai Mobile@1Gbps 620.35Mbps 737.77Mbps 70ms
Lishui Mobile@1Gbps 699.61Mbps 974.89Mbps 80ms
Jiangsu Mobile@1Gbps 215.40Mbps 352.69Mbps 74ms
Hebei Mobile@1Gbps 577.96Mbps 907.80Mbps 83ms
Northeast China Mobile@1Gbps 558.76Mbps 810.65Mbps 104ms
Shanxi Mobile@1Gbps 293.86Mbps 366.36Mbps 89ms
Sichuan Mobile@1Gbps 290.71Mbps 380.78Mbps 87ms

[Mobile Speed Test Record]

6. International Connectivity

Local latency is good. Download is just shy of saturating the 1G port, and there are no real issues.

Region Node Average/Max Upload (Mbps) Average/Max Download (Mbps) Latency (ms)
🇸🇬 Singapore RFCHOST T1 1094 / 2024 955 / 957 0.56
🇸🇬 Singapore BAGE SG 1105 / 2066 953 / 956 0.67
🇸🇬 Singapore BAGE SGS 1105 / 2075 955 / 958 0.87
🇸🇬 Singapore GreenCloud DC1 1107 / 2093 954 / 956 0.95
🇸🇬 Singapore GreenCloud DC2 1110 / 2132 955 / 958 1.28
🇸🇬 Singapore Nube 1102 / 2039 955 / 958 2.08
🇸🇬 Singapore SkylineConnect 1107 / 2093 955 / 958 0.76
🇸🇬 Singapore IDC.Care 904 / 1008 900 / 956 0.98
🇻🇳 Hanoi GreenCloud 1072 / 1861 932 / 956 45.64
🇻🇳 Ho Chi Minh City GreenCloud 1083 / 1874 933 / 995 35.17
🇮🇳 Mumbai HostDZire 421 / 489 407 / 515 53.72
🇦🇺 Sydney GreenCloud 684 / 820 800 / 956 165.27
🇺🇸 Los Angeles DMIT T1 608 / 817 448 / 750 164.59
🇺🇸 Los Angeles GreenCloud 905 / 1092 790 / 943 164.72
🇺🇸 Los Angeles AlphaVPS 906 / 1106 783 / 956 164.34
🇺🇸 Los Angeles BAGE LA1 826 / 1019 629 / 930 164.25
🇺🇸 Los Angeles BAGE LA2 846 / 1077 708 / 956 164.39
🇺🇸 Los Angeles RFCHOST T1 633 / 818 591 / 903 182.55
🇺🇸 San Jose HostDZire 851 / 1091 653 / 785 174.09
🇺🇸 San Jose GreenCloud 847 / 1099 790 / 956 174.03
🇺🇸 San Jose Nube 861 / 1092 797 / 954 166.14
🇺🇸 Seattle Misaka 953 / 1200 650 / 888 148.28
🇺🇸 Seattle AlphaVPS 946 / 1270 691 / 924 147.49
🇺🇸 Ogden GreenCloud 565 / 829 321 / 546 232.76
🇺🇸 Salt Lake City BAGE 542 / 819 72 / 117 183.38
🇺🇸 Dallas AlphaVPS 656 / 830 658 / 829 206.17
🇺🇸 Jacksonville GreenCloud 640 / 820 325 / 405 219.78
🇺🇸 Chicago GreenCloud DC1 489 / 734 55 / 149 204.50
🇺🇸 Chicago GreenCloud DC2 770 / 996 759 / 937 188.03
🇺🇸 Ashburn GreenCloud 473 / 735 319 / 425 209.11
🇺🇸 New York AlphaVPS 549 / 724 581 / 753 226.66
🇩🇪 Frankfurt BAGE 617 / 827 603 / 792 230.55
🇩🇪 Frankfurt GreenCloud 603 / 820 644 / 822 215.62
🇩🇪 Frankfurt Nube 885 / 1092 749 / 956 167.54
🇩🇪 Frankfurt BERO 874 / 1086 792 / 956 161.83
🇩🇪 Nuremberg Netcup 547 / 815 424 / 798 223.05
🇩🇪 Nuremberg AlphaVPS 904 / 1182 636 / 883 151.24
🇳🇱 Amsterdam GreenCloud 513 / 633 654 / 836 213.09
🇨🇭 Zurich Aluy 947 / 1264 681 / 941 145.01
🇧🇬 Sofia AlphaVPS 292 / 400 777 / 931 164.98
🇬🇧 London AlphaVPS 737 / 918 711 / 956 159.15
🇬🇧 Coventry BAGE 241 / 414 418 / 710 160.95
🇬🇧 Coventry GreenCloud 785 / 995 534 / 647 186.05

[Full Test Record]

7. Summary

The three networks are relatively balanced, with China Telecom slightly weaker. Both speed and latency are excellent, and local connectivity has no issues. By per-unit traffic cost it is cheaper than V.PS at 244/378/515 EUR per year, but for individual users it is still a relatively expensive machine.

If you need both Hong Kong and Singapore, you can actually buy a Hong Kong CN2 / three-network optimized / Hong Kong outbound dedicated-line machine, then connect it to a Singapore landing node with good Hong Kong-Singapore connectivity. That gives you both speed and value, and costs much less than keeping optimized machines in both Hong Kong and Singapore.

8. About the Tests

The machines used in this test, including all machines used for iPerf3 speed tests, were purchased at my own expense; results may be time-sensitive.
Kernel parameters of the test machines (/etc/sysctl.conf) are as follows.

fs.file-max = 6815744
net.ipv4.tcp_no_metrics_save=1
net.ipv4.tcp_ecn=0
net.ipv4.tcp_frto=0
net.ipv4.tcp_mtu_probing=0
net.ipv4.tcp_rfc1337=0
net.ipv4.tcp_sack=1
net.ipv4.tcp_fack=1
net.ipv4.tcp_window_scaling=1
net.ipv4.tcp_adv_win_scale=1
net.ipv4.tcp_moderate_rcvbuf=1
net.core.rmem_max=33554432
net.core.wmem_max=33554432
net.ipv4.tcp_rmem=4096 87380 33554432
net.ipv4.tcp_wmem=4096 16384 33554432
net.ipv4.udp_rmem_min=8192
net.ipv4.udp_wmem_min=8192
net.ipv4.ip_forward=1
net.ipv4.conf.all.route_localnet=1
net.ipv4.conf.all.forwarding=1
net.ipv4.conf.default.forwarding=1
net.core.default_qdisc=fq
net.ipv4.tcp_congestion_control=bbr
net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding=1
net.ipv6.conf.default.forwarding=1

9. Acknowledgements

Thanks to "Impart Speed Test“(@Kyoma ) for providing the mainland Chinapublic-interest speed test service