I heard that CeraNetworks Hong Kong's China Mobile return route was upgraded from CMI to CMIN2, so I tested this model from Rich Lady Host. xhj002

Contents

1. Configuration
2. Node Quality
3. Mainland China three-network outbound route test
4. Mainland China three-network TCP Ping
5. Evening peak speed test
6. International connectivity
7. Summary

1. Configuration

Plan 🇭🇰 BestVM Hong Kong BGP-2T
Location China, Hong Kong
CPU 1 x Intel E5-2680v4 vCPU
RAM 1GB
Disk 10GB SSD
Traffic 2TB(in+out)
Route China Mobile CMIN2; China Telecom/Unicom CMI
Bandwidth 10Gbps
Network 1 x IPv4
Price monthly CNY¥70.00

Provider website: https://bestvm.cloud

🔗 Quick links

YABS Node Quality FusionMonster nws.sh ping.pe Streaming unlock
[Link] [Link] [Link] [Link] [Link] [Link]

The upstream is CERA.

2. Node Quality

bash <(curl -sL https://run.NodeQuality.com)

💻Basic information


Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 1 hours, 18 minutes
Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz
CPU cores  : 1 @ 2399.996 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 967.9 MiB
Swap       : 533.0 MiB
Disk       : 11.0 GiB
Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Kernel     : 6.12.57+deb13-cloud-amd64
VM Type    : STANDARD PC (I440FX + PIIX, 1996)
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline

IPv4 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : Cnservers LLC
ASN        : AS40065 CNSERVERS LLC
Host       : Cloud Innovation Ltd
Location   : Hong Kong, Kowloon ()
Country    : Hong Kong

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition -):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 206.09 MB/s  (51.5k) | 1.77 GB/s    (27.6k)
Write      | 206.64 MB/s  (51.6k) | 1.78 GB/s    (27.8k)
Total      | 412.74 MB/s (103.1k) | 3.55 GB/s    (55.5k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 5.93 GB/s    (11.5k) | 6.11 GB/s     (5.9k)
Write      | 6.25 GB/s    (12.2k) | 6.52 GB/s     (6.3k)
Total      | 12.19 GB/s   (23.8k) | 12.63 GB/s   (12.3k)

Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 724                           
Multi Core      | 721                           
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23947599

 SysBench CPU Test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
---------------------------------
 1 Thread Test (Single Core) Score:          904 Scores
 SysBench Memory Test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
---------------------------------
 Single-thread Read Test:          19247.08 MB/s
 Single-thread Write Test:          14305.63 MB/s

🎬IP quality


Seychelles anycast IP. Geolocation and unlocking both look rather average.

image

🌐Network quality


image

📍Return route


Mobile return uses CMIN2, while Telecom and Unicom cross-network return uses CMI.

image

3. Mainland China three-network outbound tests (itdog.cn

Telecom outbound uses 163, Unicom outbound seems to use 163 as well, and Mobile outbound uses CMI.

Location China Telecom China Unicom China Mobile
Beijing
Shanghai
Guangzhou

4. mainland Chinathree networksTCP Ping (itdog.cn,2025-12-03 23:00)

During evening peak, Telecom and Unicom have fairly severe packet loss and jitter, while Mobile has no major issue.

China Telecom China Unicom China Mobile

5. Evening peak proxy speed tests (2025-12-03 22:30-23:30)

Telecom and Unicom cross-network CMI cannot really run. Mobile over CMIN2 is quite good, though the measured latency is a bit high.

*Click the test record to view the speed-test screenshot, including some popular models for comparison.

Telecom


Node Average speed Maximum speed TLS RTT
ShenzhenTelecom@1Gbps 10.49Kbps 87.50Kbps 44ms
GuangdongTelecom@1Gbps 5.47Kbps 43.78Kbps 395ms
GuangxiTelecom@1Gbps 2.99Mbps 8.58Mbps 190ms
ShanghaiTelecom@1Gbps 2.54Mbps 3.33Mbps 93ms
WenzhouTelecom@1Gbps 61.44Mbps 97.15Mbps 100ms
NingboTelecom@1Gbps 42.18Mbps 64.75Mbps 108ms
JiangsuTelecom@1Gbps 10.32Mbps 26.47Mbps 164ms
Xi'anTelecom@1Gbps 548.15Kbps 1.01Mbps 477ms

[Telecom speed-test records]

Unicom


Node Average speed Maximum speed TLS RTT
GuangdongUnicom@1Gbps 5.49Mbps 21.50Mbps 166ms
GuangdongUnicom@2.5Gbps 876.04Kbps 1.74Mbps 57ms
ShanghaiUnicom@1Gbps 2.77Mbps 17.40Mbps 64ms
ShaoxingUnicom@1Gbps 39.84Kbps 93.67Kbps 41ms
ShanxiUnicom@1Gbps 16.96Mbps 79.69Mbps 65ms

[Unicom speed-test records]

Mobile


Node Average speed Maximum speed TLS RTT
GuangzhouMobile@1Gbps 394.19Mbps 479.99Mbps 232ms
GuangxiMobile@1Gbps 766.37Mbps 912.48Mbps 60ms
ShanghaiMobile@1Gbps 791.65Mbps 942.17Mbps 90ms
LishuiMobile@1Gbps 757.80Mbps 937.06Mbps 128ms
JiangsuMobile@1Gbps 257.96Mbps 631.59Mbps 138ms
HebeiMobile@1Gbps 772.63Mbps 943.38Mbps 93ms
ShanxiMobile@1Gbps 539.39Mbps 574.25Mbps 89ms
WuhanMobile@1Gbps 21.09Mbps 54.39Mbps 396ms
SichuanMobile@1Gbps 471.63Mbps 523.52Mbps 86ms

[Mobile speed-test records]

6. International connectivity

Various Hong Kong landing nodes can pull it well and approach full speed. Japan and Singapore are also good. HKT seems to return via Europe, causing very high latency. Europe has high latency, low speed, and even traffic drops.

Region Node Average/max upload (Mbps) Average/max download (Mbps) Latency (ms)
🇭🇰 Hong Kong DMIT T1 1050 / 1081 821 / 941 0.88
🇭🇰 Hong Kong RFCHOST JINX 1048 / 1079 809 / 941 1.07
🇭🇰 Hong Kong RFCHOST CTC 1051 / 1076 822 / 938 0.83
🇭🇰 Hong Kong Nube 1051 / 1084 833 / 994 0.93
🇭🇰 Hong Kong GreenCloud DC1 1051 / 1097 818 / 943 0.95
🇭🇰 Hong Kong GreenCloud DC2 1048 / 1069 819 / 942 0.80
🇭🇰 Hong Kong HostHatch 1049 / 1079 818 / 944 0.87
🇭🇰 Hong Kong YxVM VOL 1049 / 1089 816 / 941 1.06
🇭🇰 Hong Kong FxTransit 1050 / 1077 816 / 943 1.12
🇭🇰 Hong Kong Hytron 1051 / 1077 820 / 942 0.85
🇭🇰 Hong Kong Halo STD 1049 / 1078 821 / 941 0.84
🇭🇰 Hong Kong Halo Lite 1051 / 1082 821 / 939 0.84
🇭🇰 Hong Kong BAGE HKS 1003 / 1019 821 / 941 0.78
🇭🇰 Hong Kong BAGE HKL 991 / 1014 828 / 993 0.91
🇭🇰 Hong Kong ClawCloud 1024 / 1087 800 / 941 3.38
🇭🇰 Hong Kong Servps 943 / 962 814 / 942 1.44
🇭🇰 Hong Kong Boil HKT 586 / 922 908 / 934 200.28
🇭🇰 Hong Kong Kaze HKBN 1050 / 1079 808 / 937 1.84
🇹🇼 Taipei Misaka 1032 / 1147 887 / 981 18.38
🇹🇼 Taichung HiNet 733 / 871 745 / 778 51.31
🇯🇵 Tokyo DMIT T1 992 / 1135 907 / 1000 45.04
🇯🇵 Tokyo BAGE JP 906 / 1002 913 / 1000 45.19
🇯🇵 Tokyo BAGE JPS 1013 / 1138 965 / 1002 45.61
🇯🇵 Tokyo Nube 1016 / 1126 909 / 1000 49.99
🇯🇵 Tokyo GreenCloud SB 839 / 968 964 / 1001 45.91
🇯🇵 Tokyo GreenCloud IIJ 657 / 1068 852 / 1001 46.24
🇯🇵 Tokyo RFCHOST T1 990 / 1122 909 / 1001 50.15
🇯🇵 Tokyo YxVM VOL 885 / 1050 911 / 1002 52.64
🇯🇵 Tokyo FxTransit 121 / 141 904 / 1000 50.54
🇰🇷 Seoul AWS Lightsail 1028 / 1109 915 / 943 38.04
🇸🇬 Singapore RFCHOST T1 1020 / 1127 848 / 1002 38.22
🇸🇬 Singapore BAGE SG 1034 / 1122 891 / 1001 30.35
🇸🇬 Singapore BAGE SGS 1020 / 1113 848 / 1001 30.69
🇸🇬 Singapore GreenCloud DC1 1019 / 1094 781 / 1000 30.71
🇸🇬 Singapore GreenCloud DC2 1025 / 1103 756 / 969 33.95
🇸🇬 Singapore Nube 961 / 1107 732 / 1005 31.41
🇸🇬 Singapore IDC.Care 893 / 1005 789 / 986 37.06
🇻🇳 Hanoi GreenCloud 1040 / 1130 896 / 1000 21.59
🇻🇳 Ho Chi Minh City GreenCloud 975 / 1075 869 / 1001 39.88
🇮🇳 Mumbai HostDZire 346 / 507 420 / 521 94.59
🇦🇺 Sydney GreenCloud 696 / 925 743 / 1000 143.29
🇺🇸 Los Angeles DMIT T1 334 / 548 42 / 152 237.89
🇺🇸 Los Angeles GreenCloud 491 / 670 654 / 967 143.62
🇺🇸 Los Angeles AlphaVPS 415 / 612 672 / 1001 147.64
🇺🇸 Los Angeles BAGE LA1 343 / 524 634 / 823 152.28
🇺🇸 Los Angeles BAGE LA2 646 / 866 587 / 923 143.70
🇺🇸 Los Angeles RFCHOST T1 239 / 738 124 / 672 249.63
🇺🇸 San Jose HostDZire 600 / 758 683 / 930 156.52
🇺🇸 San Jose GreenCloud 426 / 736 38 / 125 252.59
🇺🇸 San Jose Nube 647 / 913 644 / 997 148.57
🇺🇸 Seattle Misaka 612 / 756 783 / 998 141.97
🇺🇸 Seattle AlphaVPS 547 / 834 783 / 1002 136.42
🇺🇸 Ogden GreenCloud 447 / 725 752 / 1000 155.24
🇺🇸 Salt Lake City BAGE 673 / 897 612 / 830 157.77
🇺🇸 Dallas AlphaVPS 346 / 516 725 / 1001 175.94
🇺🇸 Jacksonville GreenCloud 201 / 409 714 / 894 198.57
🇺🇸 Chicago GreenCloud DC1 23 / 39 746 / 927 185.35
🇺🇸 Chicago GreenCloud DC2 589 / 916 638 / 868 253.73
🇺🇸 Ashburn GreenCloud 517 / 889 645 / 834 208.70
🇺🇸 New York AlphaVPS 351 / 532 452 / 743 216.16
🇷🇺 Moscow Misaka 602 / 830 59 / 114 228.80
🇩🇪 Frankfurt BAGE 728 / 960 64 / 151 193.98
🇩🇪 Frankfurt GreenCloud ERR / ERR 36 / 80 252.62
🇩🇪 Frankfurt Nube 194 / 364 59 / 152 186.43
🇩🇪 Frankfurt BERO 555 / 919 60 / 94 206.90
🇩🇪 Nuremberg Netcup 559 / 938 54 / 107 195.70
🇩🇪 Nuremberg AlphaVPS 605 / 930 60 / 124 186.55
🇳🇱 Amsterdam GreenCloud 639 / 927 37 / 84 252.60
🇨🇭 Zurich Aluy ERR / ERR ERR / ERR 305.48
🇧🇬 Sofia AlphaVPS 456 / 829 61 / 101 203.07
🇬🇧 London AlphaVPS 623 / 826 64 / 103 206.24
🇬🇧 Coventry BAGE ERR / ERR 55 / 132 273.76
🇬🇧 Coventry GreenCloud ERR / ERR 59 / 115 268.59

[Test records]

Hong Kong-Japan routes

🇭🇰 BestVM <-> 🇯🇵 DMIT 🇭🇰 BestVM <-> 🇯🇵 BAGE JPS 🇭🇰 BestVM <-> 🇯🇵 BAGE JP 🇭🇰 BestVM <-> 🇯🇵 RFCHOST
Outbound Outbound Outbound Outbound
Return Return Return Return

Hong Kong-Singapore routes

Pulling to Singapore is good across the board.

🇭🇰 BestVM <-> 🇸🇬 BAGE SGS 🇭🇰 BestVM <-> 🇸🇬 BAGE SG 🇭🇰 BestVM <-> 🇸🇬 RFCHOST
Outbound Outbound Outbound
Return Return Return

Hong Kong-Europe routes

Neither direction uses RETN, latency is high, and return speed cannot get going, so pulling to Europe is not good. xhj024

🇭🇰 BestVM <-> 🇩🇪 Netcup 🇭🇰 BestVM <-> 🇩🇪 BAGE 🇭🇰 BestVM <-> 🇬🇧 BAGE
Outbound Outbound Outbound
Return Return Return

7. Summary

Currently Mobile users are quite happy, while Telecom and Unicom cross-network access is basically unusable during evening peak. It is effectively single-network optimization. But since Mobile could switch from CMI to CMIN2, it could also switch back, so enjoy it while it lasts. If bought as a discounted plan, the value is good.

Internationally, pulling Hong Kong, Japan, and Singapore is fine; pulling Europe is not good.

8. About the tests

The machines tested in this article, including all machines used for iPerf3 speed tests, were purchased at my own expense. Results may be time-sensitive.
Kernel parameters of the tested machines (/etc/sysctl.conf) are as follows

fs.file-max = 6815744
net.ipv4.tcp_no_metrics_save=1
net.ipv4.tcp_ecn=0
net.ipv4.tcp_frto=0
net.ipv4.tcp_mtu_probing=0
net.ipv4.tcp_rfc1337=0
net.ipv4.tcp_sack=1
net.ipv4.tcp_fack=1
net.ipv4.tcp_window_scaling=1
net.ipv4.tcp_adv_win_scale=1
net.ipv4.tcp_moderate_rcvbuf=1
net.core.rmem_max=33554432
net.core.wmem_max=33554432
net.ipv4.tcp_rmem=4096 87380 33554432
net.ipv4.tcp_wmem=4096 16384 33554432
net.ipv4.udp_rmem_min=8192
net.ipv4.udp_wmem_min=8192
net.ipv4.ip_forward=1
net.ipv4.conf.all.route_localnet=1
net.ipv4.conf.all.forwarding=1
net.ipv4.conf.default.forwarding=1
net.core.default_qdisc=fq
net.ipv4.tcp_congestion_control=bbr
net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding=1
net.ipv6.conf.default.forwarding=1

9. Acknowledgements

Thanks to “Impart Speed Test“(@Kyoma ) for providing mainland Chinapublic-interest speed-test service