As the title says, last year’s 2.5G RN DC02 plan is going to be let go, so I bought the 11.11 plans and tested them xhj002

For RN Seattle, see this article:[Japan-USGSL] RackNerd Seattle Black Friday plan detailed review

1. Configuration

Plan 🇺🇸 RackNerd DC02 🇺🇸 RackNerd DC03 🇺🇸 RackNerd SJC
Location United States, Los Angeles United States, Los Angeles United States, San Jose
CPU 2vCPU 1vCPU 1vCPU
RAM 2GB 1GB 1GB
Disk 35GB 20GB 20GB
Traffic 10TB(in+out) 6TB(in+out) 6TB(in+out)
Speed 1Gbps 1Gbps 1Gbps
Network 1 x IPv4, 1 x /64 IPv6 (optional) 1 x IPv4, 1 x /64 IPv6 (optional) 1 x IPv4
Price YearlyUSD$17.66 YearlyUSD$10.76 YearlyUSD$10.76

Purchase link: https://www.racknerd.com/BlackFriday (no affiliate; the 11.11 promo has ended, and Black Friday configurations differ)
[Test before buying] Official Looking Glass : DC02 | DC03 | SJC

2. Node Quality

bash <(curl -sL https://run.NodeQuality.com)

💻 Basic Information


🇺🇸 DC02 🇺🇸 DC03 🇺🇸 SJC

🎬 IP Quality


Google access on DC03 and SJC has been ruined by neighboring users, so services like Gemini cannot be used. You can route that traffic through WARP, for example this tutorial by forum member @DuolaD this tutorial; or buy DNS unlock / use an exit node to solve it

🇺🇸 DC02 - 74 range 🇺🇸 DC02 - 148 range 🇺🇸 DC03 🇺🇸 SJC

🌐 Network Quality

ordinary direct routes for all three Chinese networks


🇺🇸 DC02 🇺🇸 DC03 🇺🇸 SJC

📍 Return Routes


🇺🇸 DC02 🇺🇸 DC03 🇺🇸 SJC

3. Streaming Unlock

bash <(curl -L -s check.unlock.media)

DC02 74 range currently unlocks the most streaming services

🇺🇸 DC02 - 74 range 🇺🇸 DC02 - 148 range 🇺🇸 DC03 🇺🇸 SJC

4. Major website & DNS latency tests

bash <(wget -qO- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Cd1s/network-latency-tester/main/latency.sh)

Real connection latency to popular websites


🇺🇸 DC02 🇺🇸 DC03 🇺🇸 SJC

Common DNS resolution speed


🇺🇸 DC02 🇺🇸 DC03 🇺🇸 SJC

5. Latency Test (itdog.cn, 2025-11-07 23:00)

All three machines show jitter and packet loss on all three Chinese networks. DC03 Unicom has the worst jitter and packet loss; the other two are okay. DC02 Mobile has relatively high latency in some regions

🇺🇸 DC02 🇺🇸 DC03 🇺🇸 SJC

6.Proxy Speed Test

During evening peak, all three machines perform just average because these are direct, unoptimized routes. Unicom has the best throughput, while Telecom and Mobile have a hard time ramping up. DC02 Unicom speeds are higher than the other two.

*Click a node name to view the speed-test screenshot

🇺🇸 DC02


Node Average speed Maximum speed TLS RTT
Shanghai Telecom@1Gbps 2.07Mbps 3.73Mbps 248ms
Wenzhou Telecom@1Gbps 1.64Mbps 5.97Mbps 167ms
Jiangsu Telecom@1Gbps 195.76Mbps 322.94Mbps 323ms
Shenzhen Telecom@1Gbps 1.95Mbps 4.46Mbps 237ms
Shanghai Unicom@1Gbps 527.37Mbps 814.79Mbps 182ms
Shaoxing Unicom@1Gbps 62.64Mbps 90.08Mbps 189ms
Shandong Unicom@1Gbps 251.54Mbps 573.53Mbps 212ms
Hunan Unicom@1Gbps 63.01Mbps 74.98Mbps 210ms
Guangdong Unicom@2.5Gbps 242.19Mbps 544.02Mbps 231ms
Shanghai Mobile@1Gbps 25.43Mbps 54.14Mbps 574ms
Lishui Mobile@1Gbps 2.52Mbps 3.33Mbps 407ms
Jiangsu Mobile@1Gbps 3.10Mbps 4.32Mbps 186ms
SichuanChina Mobile@1Gbps 5.17Mbps 9.72Mbps 489ms
Guangxi Mobile@1Gbps 7.08Mbps 11.83Mbps 404ms
Beijing Education@1Gbps 901.12Kbps 3.67Mbps 670ms

🇺🇸 DC03


Node Average speed Maximum speed TLS RTT
Shanghai Telecom@1Gbps 694.37Kbps 1.11Mbps 258ms
Wenzhou Telecom@1Gbps 9.55Mbps 17.92Mbps 219ms
Jiangsu Telecom@1Gbps 194.28Mbps 398.43Mbps 246ms
Shenzhen Telecom@1Gbps 13.82Mbps 29.07Mbps 231ms
Shanghai Unicom@1Gbps 129.74Mbps 313.78Mbps 207ms
Shaoxing Unicom@1Gbps 60.83Mbps 100.41Mbps 236ms
Shandong Unicom@1Gbps 140.20Mbps 347.45Mbps 307ms
Hunan Unicom@1Gbps 14.88Mbps 30.57Mbps 304ms
Guangdong Unicom@2.5Gbps 155.61Kbps 262.14Kbps 228ms
Shanghai Mobile@1Gbps 50.82Mbps 54.14Mbps 192ms
Lishui Mobile@1Gbps 13.54Mbps 30.75Mbps 371ms
Jiangsu Mobile@1Gbps 4.94Mbps 4.32Mbps 186ms
SichuanChina Mobile@1Gbps 219.08Kbps 524.29Kbps 527ms
Guangxi Mobile@1Gbps 396.61Kbps 655.36bps 396ms
Beijing Education@1Gbps 55.60Mbps 81.26Mbps 201ms

🇺🇸 SJC


Node Average speed Maximum speed TLS RTT
Shanghai Telecom@1Gbps 712.60Kbps 3.73Mbps 270ms
Wenzhou Telecom@1Gbps 255.56Kbps 392.96Kbps 500ms
Jiangsu Telecom@1Gbps 152.28Mbps 239.32Mbps 265ms
Shenzhen Telecom@1Gbps 47.87Kbps 196.61Kbps 437ms
Shanghai Unicom@1Gbps 658.48Mbps 873.30Mbps 172ms
Shaoxing Unicom@1Gbps 425.89Kbps 786.11Kbps 243ms
Shandong Unicom@1Gbps 86.27Mbps 204.85Mbps 427ms
Hunan Unicom@1Gbps 26.47Mbps 44.75Mbps 216ms
Guangdong Unicom@2.5Gbps 88.51Kbps 262.14Kbps 231ms
Shanghai Mobile@1Gbps 1.32Mbps 3.16Mbps 476ms
Lishui Mobile@1Gbps 17.02Mbps 34.39Mbps 212ms
Jiangsu Mobile@1Gbps 3.87Mbps 12.84Mbps 354ms
SichuanChina Mobile@1Gbps 4.18Mbps 11.90Mbps 372ms
Guangxi Mobile@1Gbps 18.94Mbps 39.75Mbps 480ms
Beijing Education@1Gbps 20.56Mbps 36.96Mbps 214ms

7. International speed test - iPerf3 TCP single-thread (single 10-second test, 2025-11-07 18:00-19:00)

Internationally, DC02 single-thread speed is slightly lower than the other two

🇺🇸 DC02


Region Node Average/max upload(Mbps) Average/max download(Mbps) Latency(ms)
🇺🇸 Los Angeles DMIT T1 825 / 832 780 / 844 0.72
🇺🇸 Los Angeles GreenCloud 828 / 835 811 / 835 0.84
🇺🇸 San Jose HostDZire 827 / 836 805 / 878 12.40
🇺🇸 Seattle Misaka 817 / 836 783 / 854 27.13
🇺🇸 Salt Lake City BAGE 828 / 836 791 / 843 13.99
🇺🇸 New York Fourplex 746 / 886 481 / 747 67.02
🇯🇵 Tokyo DMIT T1 760 / 837 577 / 782 98.92
🇯🇵 Tokyo BAGE JP (GSL) 758 / 837 528 / 705 98.24
🇯🇵 Tokyo BAGE JPS (CTC) 753 / 837 564 / 732 98.22
🇭🇰 Hong Kong DMIT T1 717 / 836 428 / 595 143.32
🇭🇰 Hong Kong BAGE HKS (CTC) 539 / 827 318 / 598 152.60
🇭🇰 Hong Kong BAGE HKL 623 / 838 298 / 499 150.68
🇸🇬 Singapore BAGE SG (GSL) 695 / 836 360 / 586 164.47
🇸🇬 Singapore BAGE SGS (CTC) 691 / 838 363 / 556 176.89

🇺🇸 DC03


Region Node Average/max upload(Mbps) Average/max download(Mbps) Latency(ms)
🇺🇸 Los Angeles DMIT T1 844 / 900 490 / 510 0.51
🇺🇸 Los Angeles GreenCloud 808 / 857 889 / 907 1.10
🇺🇸 San Jose HostDZire 804 / 902 849 / 891 12.53
🇺🇸 Seattle Misaka 776 / 948 843 / 950 27.55
🇺🇸 Salt Lake City BAGE 768 / 868 850 / 943 30.89
🇺🇸 New York Fourplex 527 / 673 734 / 937 67.28
🇯🇵 Tokyo DMIT T1 579 / 787 623 / 809 99.26
🇯🇵 Tokyo BAGE JP (GSL) 588 / 681 661 / 889 98.42
🇯🇵 Tokyo BAGE JPS (CTC) 516 / 639 612 / 753 98.37
🇭🇰 Hong Kong DMIT T1 549 / 864 487 / 725 143.64
🇭🇰 Hong Kong BAGE HKS (CTC) 610 / 781 461 / 642 164.53
🇭🇰 Hong Kong BAGE HKL 554 / 875 541 / 833 151.05
🇸🇬 Singapore BAGE SG (GSL) 423 / 601 422 / 748 164.28
🇸🇬 Singapore BAGE SGS (CTC) 499 / 833 411 / 642 174.86

🇺🇸 SJC


Region Node Average/max upload(Mbps) Average/max download(Mbps) Latency(ms)
🇺🇸 Los Angeles DMIT T1 905 / 940 547 / 583 12.13
🇺🇸 Los Angeles GreenCloud 905 / 926 909 / 946 12.28
🇺🇸 San Jose HostDZire 897 / 916 894 / 919 1.67
🇺🇸 Seattle Misaka 894 / 946 867 / 941 18.70
🇺🇸 Salt Lake City BAGE 869 / 907 880 / 957 20.08
🇺🇸 New York Fourplex 691 / 824 679 / 838 61.99
🇯🇵 Tokyo DMIT T1 682 / 836 640 / 848 110.36
🇯🇵 Tokyo BAGE JP (GSL) 663 / 856 645 / 854 109.41
🇯🇵 Tokyo BAGE JPS (CTC) 726 / 909 554 / 730 109.49
🇭🇰 Hong Kong DMIT T1 595 / 869 534 / 926 154.69
🇭🇰 Hong Kong BAGE HKS (CTC) 678 / 850 530 / 717 162.14
🇭🇰 Hong Kong BAGE HKL 576 / 725 393 / 678 159.96
🇸🇬 Singapore BAGE SG (GSL) 585 / 830 392 / 630 175.71
🇸🇬 Singapore BAGE SGS (CTC) 646 / 782 487 / 741 175.47

8. Summary

For pure proxy use, there is no need to blindly follow the hype and buy these, because none of the three machines is optimized and evening-peak performance may disappoint. Among the three Chinese networks, Unicom direct performs best; among the three machines, DC02 is the best overall for direct connection.

9. About The Tests

All machines used in this article (including all machines participating in iPerf3 tests) were purchased at my own expense; results may be time-sensitive
Kernel parameters of the test machines (/etc/sysctl.conf) are as follows

fs.file-max = 6815744
net.ipv4.tcp_no_metrics_save=1
net.ipv4.tcp_ecn=0
net.ipv4.tcp_frto=0
net.ipv4.tcp_mtu_probing=0
net.ipv4.tcp_rfc1337=0
net.ipv4.tcp_sack=1
net.ipv4.tcp_fack=1
net.ipv4.tcp_window_scaling=1
net.ipv4.tcp_adv_win_scale=1
net.ipv4.tcp_moderate_rcvbuf=1
net.core.rmem_max=33554432
net.core.wmem_max=33554432
net.ipv4.tcp_rmem=4096 87380 33554432
net.ipv4.tcp_wmem=4096 16384 33554432
net.ipv4.udp_rmem_min=8192
net.ipv4.udp_wmem_min=8192
net.ipv4.ip_forward=1
net.ipv4.conf.all.route_localnet=1
net.ipv4.conf.all.forwarding=1
net.ipv4.conf.default.forwarding=1
net.core.default_qdisc=fq
net.ipv4.tcp_congestion_control=bbr
net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding=1
net.ipv6.conf.default.forwarding=1

10. Acknowledgements

Thanks to "Impart Speedtest"(@Kyoma) for providing public-benefit speed testing services