[High-Q Direct] GoMami HKG Pulse Mini Hong Kong 163pp/4837/CMI 1Gbps at $33/month - Detailed Network Test

Original title: [High-Q direct] YxVM downstream HKG Pulse Mini Hong Kong 163pp/4837/CMI 1Gbps at $33/month DetailedNetwork Test

I bought one myself to test; no AFF and no link, for reference only.

💻 Basic Information

Performance is quite strong.

# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #
#              Yet-Another-Bench-Script              #
#                     v2025-04-20                    #
# https://github.com/masonr/yet-another-bench-script #
# ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## ## #

Wed Aug 13 02:29:26 PM CST 2025

Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 8 hours, 54 minutes
Processor  : AMD EPYC 7763 64-Core Processor
CPU cores  : 2 @ 2449.986 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 3.8 GiB
Swap       : 0.0 KiB
Disk       : 39.1 GiB
Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 13 (trixie)
Kernel     : 6.12.38+deb13-cloud-amd64
VM Type    : KVM
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ❌ Offline

IPv4 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : Next Hop LLC
ASN        : AS36002 Next Hop LLC
Host       : Telescope Communications
Location   : Hong Kong, Kowloon ()
Country    : Hong Kong

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition /dev/sdb1):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 329.87 MB/s  (82.4k) | 1.12 GB/s    (17.5k)
Write      | 330.74 MB/s  (82.6k) | 1.12 GB/s    (17.6k)
Total      | 660.62 MB/s (165.1k) | 2.25 GB/s    (35.1k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 1.14 GB/s     (2.2k) | 1.22 GB/s     (1.1k)
Write      | 1.20 GB/s     (2.3k) | 1.30 GB/s     (1.2k)
Total      | 2.35 GB/s     (4.5k) | 2.53 GB/s     (2.4k)

Geekbench 4 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 5439                          
Multi Core      | 9583                          
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/18940456

Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 1161                          
Multi Core      | 2303                          
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23723975

Geekbench 6 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 1534                          
Multi Core      | 2826                          
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v6/cpu/13295253

YABS completed in 12 min 4 sec

🌐 Network Test

• IP Quality & Network Quality

IP Quality	Network Quality

• Three-network TCP Ping latency (itdog.cn )
  

• Three-network TCP Ping return-route test (Zstatic CDN Dispatch Center )

notAs expected from a highly guaranteed route. This is the first time I have seen a route-optimized VPS with such low latency across all three carriers, for example Guangdong.

• Three-network outbound route test (itdog.cn )

Mainland China IDC network test (non-residential, for reference only)

• ICMP Ping test(unit: ms, samples: 10,000, 2025-08-13 18:00-21:00)

latencyandpacket lossLatency and packet-loss performance are quite good. Cloud-provider return routes surprisingly go via CMI around Shanghai instead of 163. Liqun’s packet loss being that high seems a bit abnormal.

• iPerf3 TCP single-thread test (single 30-second run, 2025-08-13 22:00)

single-threadSingle-thread performance is good; CMI also fills the pipe during evening peak. Ordinary CMI via Lumen, pulled from this Yunxi Huanjing Guangzhou node, usually only reaches around 500Mbps. Retransmissions are also good

internationalNetwork Test

• internationalspeed test (nws.sh)

---------------------------------- nws.sh ---------------------------------
      A simple script to bench network performance using speedtest-cli     
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Version            : v2025.07.08
 Global Speedtest   : wget -qO- nws.sh | bash
 Region Speedtest   : wget -qO- nws.sh | bash -s -- -r <region>
 Ping & Routing     : wget -qO- nws.sh | bash -s -- -rt <region>
 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Speedtest.net (Region: GLOBAL)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Location         Latency     Loss    DL Speed       UP Speed       Server      

 ISP: NEXTHOP 

 Nearest          1.56 ms     0.0%    957.06 Mbps    999.26 Mbps    SoSIM - Hong Kong 

 Bangalore, IN    69.49 ms    0.0%    962.82 Mbps    1108.71 Mbps   Bharti Airtel Ltd - Bangalore 
 Chennai, IN      64.03 ms    0.0%    954.26 Mbps    1090.67 Mbps   Jio - Chennai 
 Mumbai, IN       181.18 ms   0.0%    1019.20 Mbps   456.84 Mbps    Melbicom - Mumbai 

 Seattle, US      161.18 ms   N/A     902.96 Mbps    520.08 Mbps    Comcast - Seattle, WA 
 Los Angeles, US  182.17 ms   0.0%    814.49 Mbps    322.36 Mbps    ReliableSite Hosting - Los Angeles, CA 
 Dallas, US       231.69 ms   0.0%    891.49 Mbps    361.20 Mbps    Hivelocity - Dallas, TX 
 Miami, US        284.79 ms   0.0%    665.31 Mbps    284.90 Mbps    Telxius - Miami, FL 
 New York, US     233.91 ms   0.0%    990.73 Mbps    355.22 Mbps    GSL Networks - New York, NY 
 Toronto, CA      218.92 ms   0.0%    787.73 Mbps    374.97 Mbps    Rogers - Toronto, ON 
 Mexico City, MX  191.87 ms   N/A     818.78 Mbps    431.21 Mbps    INFINITUM - Ciudad de México 

 London, UK       183.50 ms   0.0%    998.48 Mbps    454.78 Mbps    VeloxServ Communications - London 
 Amsterdam, NL    175.82 ms   0.0%    1002.34 Mbps   480.09 Mbps    31173 Services AB - Amsterdam 
 Paris, FR        FAILED                                                        
 Frankfurt, DE    184.87 ms   0.7%    646.78 Mbps    445.62 Mbps    Clouvider Ltd - Frankfurt am Main 
 Warsaw, PL       168.76 ms   0.0%    997.58 Mbps    465.51 Mbps    Play - Warszawa 
 Bucharest, RO    209.19 ms   0.0%    1010.47 Mbps   418.09 Mbps    Vodafone Romania Mobile - Bucharest - Bucharest 
 Moscow, RU       FAILED                                                        

 Jeddah, SA       244.82 ms   0.0%    966.34 Mbps    344.03 Mbps    Saudi Telecom Company 
 Dubai, AE        105.49 ms   0.0%    969.55 Mbps    105.17 Mbps    e& UAE - Dubai 
 Istanbul, TR     292.60 ms   0.0%    732.95 Mbps    283.13 Mbps    Turkcell - Istanbul 
 Tehran, IR       254.09 ms   0.0%    775.89 Mbps    307.43 Mbps    Irancell - Tehran 
 Cairo, EG        196.53 ms   0.0%    867.09 Mbps    402.68 Mbps    Telecom Egypt - Cairo 

 Tokyo, JP        FAILED                                                        
 Chengdu, CM-CN   FAILED                                                        
 Hong Kong, CN    1.49 ms     0.0%    956.94 Mbps    698.27 Mbps    Misaka Network, Inc. - Hong Kong 
 Singapore, SG    FAILED                                                        
 Jakarta, ID      52.24 ms    0.0%    957.80 Mbps    1041.24 Mbps   PT Solnet Indonesia - Jakarta 

 Sydney, AU       131.42 ms   0.0%    1005.65 Mbps   645.74 Mbps    Aussie Broadband - Sydney 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Avg DL Speed       : 902.19 Mbps
 Avg UL Speed       : 516.55 Mbps

 Total DL Data      : 29.74 GB
 Total UL Data      : 16.79 GB
 Total Data         : 46.53 GB
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Duration           : 12 min 29 sec
 System Time        : 13/08/2025 - 14:56:03 CST
 Total Script Runs  : 120567
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Result             : https://result.nws.sh/r/1755067556_NZT6JP_GLOBAL.txt
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

• ICMP Ping test(unit: ms, samples: 10,000, 2025-08-13 18:00-21:00)

RFC CTCRFC CTC has less latency jitter than JINX. Latency to Hinet is good. To RFC T1 JP it goes through RETN-SoftBank, with low latency but a small amount of packet loss. Seattle has the lowest latency to the US

• iPerf3 TCP single-thread test (single 30-second run, 2025-08-13 23:00)

Within Hong Kong, it can easily pull various local landing nodes, but downloads from peers seem capped at 943Mbps, just short of saturating a gigabit port. US/Europe results are lower because TCP tuning was not applied; tuning is generally recommended

🔗 About the Tests

All machines tested in this article were purchased at my own expense; tests only enabled BBR+FQ, with all other kernel parameters left at defaults; results may be time-sensitive.