I got into this scene relatively late. WAWO used to have a strong reputation, and recently it also received a provider badge on the forum, so I tested its PIS product to see how it performs. ac01

Contents

1. Configuration
2. Node Quality and Mixed Benchmark
3. Mainland Three-Network Outbound Route Tests
4. Mainland Three-Network TCP Ping
5. Evening Peak Direct Single-Thread Speed Tests
6. International Connectivity
7. Summary

1. Configuration

Plan 🇭🇰 WAWO pis-Excellence-2G-31-pro
Location China, Hong Kong
CPU 2 x E5-2680v4 vCores
RAM 2GB
Disk 20GB
Traffic 2TB(out)
Port Speed 1000Mbps peak during off-peak, 20Mbps standard
Network 1 x IPv4
Price Annual CNY¥317.50

🔗 Quick Links

YABS Node Quality Mixed Benchmark nws.sh Streaming Unlock
[Link] [Link] [Link] [Link] [Link]

The upstream is Landups, said to be strong with both small and large packets, but let's test it first.

2. Node Quality and Mixed Benchmark

bash <(curl -sL https://run.NodeQuality.com)

Native Hong Kong IP, good unlock.
PIS seems unfriendly to NQ traceroute and mainland China test nodes, so they could not be measured; the mixed benchmark appears to show Telecom CN2 GIA, Unicom 4837->10099, and Mobile CMIN2.

💻 Basic Information


Basic System Information:
---------------------------------
Uptime     : 0 days, 20 hours, 34 minutes
Processor  : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v4 @ 2.40GHz
CPU cores  : 2 @ 2394.454 MHz
AES-NI     : ✔ Enabled
VM-x/AMD-V : ✔ Enabled
RAM        : 1.9 GiB
Swap       : 0.0 KiB
Disk       : 21.0 GiB
Distro     : Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)
Kernel     : 6.12.57+deb13-cloud-amd64
VM Type    : STANDARD PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)
IPv4/IPv6  : ✔ Online / ✔ Online

IPv6 Network Information:
---------------------------------
ISP        : Landups Limited
ASN        : AS150452 LANDUPS LIMITED
Host       : Landups Limited
Location   : Mong Kok, Yau Tsim Mong District (KYT)
Country    : Hong Kong

fio Disk Speed Tests (Mixed R/W 50/50) (Partition -):
---------------------------------
Block Size | 4k            (IOPS) | 64k           (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 233.02 MB/s  (58.2k) | 1.35 GB/s    (21.2k)
Write      | 233.63 MB/s  (58.4k) | 1.36 GB/s    (21.3k)
Total      | 466.65 MB/s (116.6k) | 2.72 GB/s    (42.5k)
           |                      |                     
Block Size | 512k          (IOPS) | 1m            (IOPS)
  ------   | ---            ----  | ----           ---- 
Read       | 638.79 MB/s   (1.2k) | 573.97 MB/s    (560)
Write      | 672.74 MB/s   (1.3k) | 612.19 MB/s    (597)
Total      | 1.31 GB/s     (2.5k) | 1.18 GB/s     (1.1k)

Geekbench 5 Benchmark Test:
---------------------------------
Test            | Value                         
                |                               
Single Core     | 586                           
Multi Core      | 1198                          
Full Test       | https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/23965783

 SysBench CPU Test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
---------------------------------
 1 Thread Test (Single Core) Score:          758 Scores
 2 Thread Test (Multi Core) Score:          1615 Scores
 SysBench Memory Test (Fast Mode, 1-Pass @ 5sec)
---------------------------------
 Single-Thread Read Test:          18064.12 MB/s
 Single-Thread Write Test:          13867.95 MB/s
🎬IP Quality 🌐 Network Quality 📍Return Routes
image image image

Mixed Benchmark


export noninteractive=true && curl -L https://raw.githubusercontent.com/oneclickvirt/ecs/master/goecs.sh -o goecs.sh && chmod +x goecs.sh && ./goecs.sh install && goecs
------------------------------------Upstream and Return Route Check-------------------------------------
Beijing Telecom v4 219.141.140.10           Telecom CN2GIA [Premium Route] Telecom CTGNET [Premium Route] 
Beijing Unicom v4 202.106.195.68           Unicom 4837   [Normal Route] 
Beijing Mobile v4 221.179.155.161          Mobile CMI    [Normal Route] Mobile CMIN2  [Premium Route] 
Shanghai Telecom v4 202.96.209.133           Telecom CN2GIA [Premium Route] Telecom CTGNET [Premium Route] 
Shanghai Unicom v4 210.22.97.1              Unicom 4837   [Normal Route] 
Shanghai Mobile v4 211.136.112.200          Mobile CMI    [Normal Route] Mobile CMIN2  [Premium Route] 
Guangzhou Telecom v4 58.60.188.222            Telecom CN2GIA [Premium Route] Telecom CTGNET [Premium Route] 
Guangzhou Unicom v4 210.21.196.6    Unable to detect the IPv4 address of the return-route node
Guangzhou Mobile v4 120.196.165.24           Mobile CMI    [Normal Route] Mobile CMIN2  [Premium Route] 
Chengdu Telecom v4 61.139.2.69              Telecom CN2GIA [Premium Route] 
Chengdu Unicom v4 119.6.6.6                Unicom 4837   [Normal Route] 
Chengdu Mobile v4 211.137.96.205           Mobile CMI    [Normal Route] Mobile CMIN2  [Premium Route] 
Beijing Telecom v6 2400:89c0:1053:3::69     Telecom 163    [Normal Route] 
Beijing Unicom v6 2400:89c0:1013:3::54     Unicom 4837   [Normal Route] 
Beijing Mobile v6 2409:8c00:8421:1303::55  Mobile CMIN2  [Premium Route] Mobile CMI    [Normal Route] 
Shanghai Telecom v6 240e:e1:aa00:4000::24    Telecom 163    [Normal Route] 
Shanghai Unicom v6 2408:80f1:21:5003::a     Unicom 4837   [Normal Route] 
Shanghai Mobile v6 2409:8c1e:75b0:3003::26  Mobile CMIN2  [Premium Route] Mobile CMI    [Normal Route] 
Guangzhou Telecom v6 240e:97c:2f:3000::44     Telecom 163    [Normal Route] 
Guangzhou Unicom v6 2408:8756:f50:1001::c    Unicom 4837   [Normal Route] 
Guangzhou Mobile v6 2409:8c54:871:1001::12   Mobile CMI    [Normal Route] Mobile CMIN2  [Premium Route] 
Check detailed routes yourself for the exact path; this test result is for reference only
When multiple routes appear for the same target address, detection may have passed the aggregation layer; information after the first route may be invalid
-------------------------------------Three-Network Return Route Check-------------------------------------
[NextTrace API] preferred API IP - 172.67.69.163 - 236.67ms - Misaka.BER
Guangzhou Telecom - ICMP v4 - traceroute to 58.60.188.222, 30 hops max, 52 byte packets
0.54 ms      AS152918   *                  China, Hong Kong, cdn.liberally.network 
1.24 ms      *          *                  *
0.90 ms      *          *                  *
1.32 ms      *          *                  *
1.26 ms      AS23764    [CTHKI-HK]         China, Hong Kong, chinatelecomglobal.com  Telecom
2.38 ms      *          *                  China, Hong Kong, Telecom/CTGNet
2.49 ms      *          *                  China, Hong Kong, Telecom/CTGNet
6.17 ms      *          [CTG-CN]           China, Guangdong, Guangzhou, CTGNet
7.44 ms      *          [CN2-BackBone]     China, Guangdong, Guangzhou, chinatelecom.cn  Telecom
10.30 ms     *          [CN2-BackBone]     China, Guangdong, Guangzhou, chinatelecom.cn  Telecom
14.25 ms     *          [CN2-BackBone]     China, Guangdong, Guangzhou, chinatelecom.cn  Telecom
10.63 ms     AS4134     *                  China, Guangdong, Foshan City, chinatelecom.com.cn  Telecom
*
Guangzhou Unicom - ICMP v4 - traceroute to 210.21.196.6, 30 hops max, 52 byte packets
0.46 ms      AS152918   *                  China, Hong Kong, cdn.liberally.network 
1.11 ms      *          *                  *
0.73 ms      *          *                  *
1.29 ms      *          *                  *
12.67 ms     AS24429    *                  China, Hong Kong, alibabacloud.com 
2.30 ms      *          [CUG-ASIA]         China, Hong Kong
2.70 ms      AS10099    [CUG-BACKBONE]     China, Hong Kong, chinaunicomglobal.com  Unicom
2.76 ms      AS10099    [CUG-BACKBONE]     China, Hong Kong, chinaunicomglobal.com  Unicom
*
6.78 ms      AS4837     [CU169-BACKBONE]   China, Guangdong, Guangzhou, chinaunicom.cn  Unicom
*
12.93 ms     AS17623    [APNIC-AP]         China, Guangdong, Shenzhen, chinaunicom.cn  Unicom
10.20 ms     AS17623    *                  China, Guangdong, Shenzhen, chinaunicom.cn  Unicom
Guangzhou Mobile - ICMP v4 - traceroute to 120.196.165.24, 30 hops max, 52 byte packets
1.04 ms      AS152918   *                  China, Hong Kong, cdn.liberally.network 
*
1.75 ms      AS58807    [CMIN2-NET]        China, Hong Kong, cmi.chinamobile.com 
*
5.52 ms      AS58807    [CMIN2-NET]        China, Hong Kong, cmi.chinamobile.com  Mobile
5.12 ms      AS58807    [CMIN2-NET]        China, Guangdong, Guangzhou, cmi.chinamobile.com  Mobile
5.17 ms      AS9808     [CMNET]            China, Guangdong, Guangzhou, chinamobileltd.com  Mobile
5.04 ms      AS9808     [CMNET]            China, Guangdong, Guangzhou, chinamobileltd.com  Mobile
18.04 ms     AS9808     [CMNET]            China, Guangdong, Guangzhou, chinamobileltd.com  Mobile
11.82 ms     AS9808     [CMNET]            China, Guangdong, Guangzhou, chinamobileltd.com  Mobile
13.19 ms     AS9808     [CMNET]            China, Guangdong, Guangzhou, chinamobileltd.com  Mobile
11.42 ms     AS56040    [APNIC-AP]         China, Guangdong, Shenzhen, gd.10086.cn  Mobile

3. Mainland Three-Network Outbound Route Tests (itdog.cn, 2025-12-11)

Outbound uses each network's own backbone direct route: China Telecom 163, China Unicom 4837->10099, and China Mobile CMI.

Location China Telecom China Unicom China Mobile
Beijing
Shanghai
Guangzhou

4. mainland ChinaThree-Network TCP Ping(itdog.cn, 2025-12-11 23:00)

During the evening peak, outbound routes for all three networks are fairly rough, especially China Telecom, with double-digit packet loss in many regions.

China Telecom China Unicom China Mobile

5. Evening Peak Direct Single-Thread Speed Tests(2025-12-06 21:40-23:00)

China Telecom starts slowly and may cut out; TLS latency is high and HTTP latency is abnormally high. Some nodes can reach speed, but others cannot.
China Unicom seems a bit better and can reach speed, but HTTP latency is still very high.
China Mobile cannot really reach speed, and latency is also high.

*Click the test record links to view speed-test screenshots, including several popular models as references.

Telecom


Node Average Speed Maximum Speed Latency RTT HTTP Latency
ShenzhenTelecom@1Gbps 180.45Mbps 262.96Mbps 23ms 863ms
GuangdongTelecom@1Gbps 140.46Mbps 520.08Mbps 25ms 1395ms
Eastern Guangdong Telecom@1Gbps 410.52Mbps 753.96Mbps 33ms 1143ms
GuangxiTelecom@1Gbps 3.85Mbps 7.84Mbps 41ms 523ms
HainanTelecom@1Gbps 124.40Mbps 168.67Mbps 63ms 556ms
ShanghaiTelecom@1Gbps 416.41Mbps 788.56Mbps 46ms 619ms
Ningbo Telecom@1Gbps 441.34Mbps 792.11Mbps 73ms 953ms
WenzhouTelecom@1Gbps 41.93Mbps 212.60Mbps 44ms 730ms
Xi'an Telecom@1Gbps 332.08Mbps 552.04Mbps 61ms 989ms

[Telecom Speed Test Record]

Unicom


Node Average Speed Maximum Speed Latency RTT HTTP Latency
GuangdongUnicom@1Gbps 460.22Mbps 582.66Mbps 14ms 431ms
GuangdongUnicom@2.5Gbps 688.59Mbps 880.57Mbps 15ms 92ms
ShanghaiUnicom@1Gbps 89.73Mbps 666.32Mbps 38ms 707ms
ShaoxingUnicom@1Gbps 408.67Mbps 628.02Mbps 38ms 588ms
ShandongUnicom@1Gbps 349.25Mbps 591.75Mbps 64ms 645ms
ShanxiUnicom@1Gbps 644.13Mbps 971.70Mbps 54ms 1722ms
LiaoningUnicom@1Gbps 15.70Mbps 125.24Mbps 54ms 718ms

[Unicom Speed Test Record]

Mobile


Node Average Speed Maximum Speed Latency RTT HTTP Latency
Guangzhou Mobile@1Gbps 8.80Mbps 20.43Mbps 64ms 910ms
Guangxi Mobile@1Gbps 36.36Mbps 52.36Mbps 99ms 559ms
Shanghai Mobile@2Gbps 970.03Kbps 7.49Mbps 127ms 871ms
Lishui Mobile@1Gbps 4.71Mbps 5.55Mbps 144ms 393ms
Jiangsu Mobile@1Gbps 0bps 0bps 105ms 345ms
Hebei Mobile@1Gbps 172.83Mbps 272.86Mbps 93ms 475ms
Northeast China Mobile@1Gbps 13.40Mbps 36.61Mbps 73ms 833ms
Shanxi Mobile@1Gbps 39.83Kbps 93.59Kbps 205ms 955ms
Sichuan Mobile@1Gbps 39.84Kbps 87.42Kbps 95ms 1030ms

[Mobile Speed Test Record]

6. International Connectivity - iPerf3 TCP IPv4 Single-Thread Speed Test (single 10-second run, 2025-12-11)

Test Tool: iPerf3

Speed and latency within Hong Kong and across Asia-Pacific have no real issues; quite good.

Region Node Average/Max Upload (Mbps) Average/Max Download (Mbps) Latency (ms)
🇭🇰 Hong Kong DMIT T1 1098 / 1991 946 / 949 0.89
🇭🇰 Hong Kong RFCHOST JINX 1114 / 2189 936 / 943 2.34
🇭🇰 Hong Kong RFCHOST CTC 1113 / 2148 946 / 950 0.82
🇭🇰 Hong Kong Nube 1107 / 2099 918 / 949 0.91
🇭🇰 Hong Kong GreenCloud DC1 1105 / 2077 945 / 950 0.86
🇭🇰 Hong Kong GreenCloud DC2 1107 / 2080 942 / 948 0.79
🇭🇰 Hong Kong HostHatch 1108 / 2082 944 / 947 1.40
🇭🇰 Hong Kong YxVM VOL 1111 / 2173 941 / 947 1.17
🇭🇰 Hong Kong FxTransit 1109 / 2087 941 / 950 1.08
🇭🇰 Hong Kong Hytron 1108 / 2103 945 / 949 0.89
🇭🇰 Hong Kong Halo STD 1103 / 2070 941 / 945 0.72
🇭🇰 Hong Kong Halo Lite 1104 / 2063 943 / 948 0.67
🇭🇰 Hong Kong BAGE HKS 1002 / 1018 948 / 950 2.27
🇭🇰 Hong Kong BAGE HKL 997 / 1014 944 / 949 0.83
🇭🇰 Hong Kong ClawCloud 1032 / 1213 939 / 947 2.63
🇭🇰 Hong Kong Servps 948 / 963 948 / 952 1.41
🇭🇰 Hong Kong Boil HKT 913 / 946 853 / 875 2.86
🇭🇰 Hong Kong Kaze HKBN 1109 / 2110 924 / 933 2.54
🇹🇼 Taichung HiNet 766 / 816 758 / 780 32.77
🇯🇵 Tokyo DMIT T1 1079 / 1834 897 / 942 46.08
🇯🇵 Tokyo BAGE JP 1072 / 1537 886 / 1015 45.19
🇯🇵 Tokyo BAGE JPS 1081 / 1774 891 / 934 49.13
🇯🇵 Tokyo Nube 1068 / 1777 881 / 956 46.68
🇯🇵 Tokyo GreenCloud SB 1035 / 1413 878 / 991 45.54
🇯🇵 Tokyo GreenCloud IIJ 178 / 911 727 / 937 45.90
🇯🇵 Tokyo DDPS CDN77 1074 / 1756 879 / 942 45.31
🇯🇵 Tokyo RFCHOST T1 1070 / 1582 890 / 943 50.43
🇯🇵 Tokyo YxVM VOL 1063 / 1637 894 / 939 49.44
🇯🇵 Tokyo FxTransit 134 / 170 897 / 946 49.94
🇯🇵 Tokyo SkylineConnect 1069 / 1590 897 / 967 51.03
🇰🇷 Seoul AWS Lightsail 1023 / 1619 837 / 925 58.64
🇸🇬 Singapore RFCHOST T1 1097 / 2010 908 / 950 37.41
🇸🇬 Singapore BAGE SG 1092 / 1983 916 / 944 30.25
🇸🇬 Singapore BAGE SGS 1090 / 1833 913 / 971 32.05
🇸🇬 Singapore GreenCloud DC1 1091 / 1973 916 / 947 30.75
🇸🇬 Singapore GreenCloud DC2 1091 / 1863 906 / 947 31.38
🇸🇬 Singapore Nube 1089 / 1851 913 / 987 31.85
🇸🇬 Singapore SkylineConnect 1086 / 1768 904 / 1011 30.706
🇸🇬 Singapore IDC.Care 900 / 1039 882 / 940 34.22
🇻🇳 Hanoi GreenCloud 1084 / 1880 885 / 941 53.44
🇻🇳 Ho Chi Minh City GreenCloud 1063 / 1705 885 / 971 53.44
🇮🇳 Mumbai HostDZire 396 / 500 379 / 446 118.99
🇦🇺 Sydney GreenCloud 947 / 1217 663 / 854 143.32
🇺🇸 Los Angeles DMIT T1 810 / 1039 266 / 380 143.56
🇺🇸 Los Angeles GreenCloud 942 / 1268 680 / 840 143.77
🇺🇸 Los Angeles AlphaVPS 954 / 1293 678 / 924 144.36
🇺🇸 Los Angeles HostDZire 942 / 1282 697 / 934 147.49
🇺🇸 Los Angeles BAGE LA1 869 / 1055 611 / 868 144.05
🇺🇸 Los Angeles BAGE LA2 736 / 927 589 / 861 158.70
🇺🇸 Los Angeles RFCHOST T1 330 / 765 375 / 483 140.69
🇺🇸 San Jose HostDZire 932 / 1200 629 / 849 156.84
🇺🇸 San Jose GreenCloud 959 / 1236 653 / 928 156.29
🇺🇸 San Jose Nube 951 / 1190 776 / 936 158.40
🇺🇸 Las Vegas BuyVM 526 / 757 537 / 714 240.56
🇺🇸 Seattle Misaka 973 / 1351 761 / 942 137.71
🇺🇸 Seattle AlphaVPS 956 / 1268 814 / 936 133.50
🇺🇸 Ogden GreenCloud 904 / 1120 561 / 779 164.13
🇺🇸 Salt Lake City BAGE 848 / 1069 605 / 828 158.09
🇺🇸 Dallas AlphaVPS 838 / 1076 737 / 933 174.66
🇺🇸 Jacksonville GreenCloud 552 / 689 466 / 871 202.42
🇺🇸 Chicago GreenCloud DC1 692 / 979 539 / 889 191.57
🇺🇸 Chicago GreenCloud DC2 820 / 1019 607 / 742 178.68
🇺🇸 Ashburn GreenCloud 632 / 879 678 / 891 198.09
🇺🇸 Washington HostDZire 723 / 972 715 / 895 198.46
🇺🇸 New York AlphaVPS 720 / 973 727 / 906 198.34
🇩🇪 Frankfurt BAGE 894 / 1100 754 / 932 169.12
🇩🇪 Frankfurt GreenCloud 809 / 1062 510 / 919 181.14
🇩🇪 Frankfurt Nube 852 / 1086 49 / 249 163.66
🇩🇪 Frankfurt BERO 878 / 1093 749 / 932 169.59
🇩🇪 Nuremberg Netcup 507 / 749 17 / 112 220.38
🇩🇪 Nuremberg AlphaVPS 545 / 768 32 / 104 224.36
🇳🇱 Amsterdam GreenCloud 605 / 771 719 / 940 188.13
🇧🇬 Sofia AlphaVPS 369 / 591 425 / 664 206.58
🇬🇧 London AlphaVPS 179 / 349 125 / 153 175.69
🇬🇧 Coventry BAGE 368 / 602 557 / 791 187.79
🇬🇧 Coventry GreenCloud 816 / 1001 21 / 125 168.43

[Test Record]

7. Summary

How to put it: evening-peak direct connectivity is better than unoptimized GreenCloud, but it also has clear flaws. Small-packet latency is acceptable, but HTTP latency is extremely high. I am not sure whether this is due to the China route; if not, using a landing node might help, though that would waste the native IP. Outbound routes are also quite rough. In this test, most mainland China Telecom and China Unicom nodes still had speed, but China Mobile did not perform well.

International connectivity has no real issues and is fine.

At this price (45 USD), there are other options for direct Asia-Pacific connectivity, but considering it is in Hong Kong, it depends on your needs. xhj032

8. About the Tests

The machines used in this test, including all machines used for iPerf3 speed tests, were purchased at my own expense; results may be time-sensitive.
Kernel parameters of the test machines (/etc/sysctl.conf) are as follows.

fs.file-max = 6815744
net.ipv4.tcp_no_metrics_save=1
net.ipv4.tcp_ecn=0
net.ipv4.tcp_frto=0
net.ipv4.tcp_mtu_probing=0
net.ipv4.tcp_rfc1337=0
net.ipv4.tcp_sack=1
net.ipv4.tcp_fack=1
net.ipv4.tcp_window_scaling=1
net.ipv4.tcp_adv_win_scale=1
net.ipv4.tcp_moderate_rcvbuf=1
net.core.rmem_max=33554432
net.core.wmem_max=33554432
net.ipv4.tcp_rmem=4096 87380 33554432
net.ipv4.tcp_wmem=4096 16384 33554432
net.ipv4.udp_rmem_min=8192
net.ipv4.udp_wmem_min=8192
net.ipv4.ip_forward=1
net.ipv4.conf.all.route_localnet=1
net.ipv4.conf.all.forwarding=1
net.ipv4.conf.default.forwarding=1
net.core.default_qdisc=fq
net.ipv4.tcp_congestion_control=bbr
net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding=1
net.ipv6.conf.default.forwarding=1

9. Acknowledgements

Thanks to "Impart Speed Test“(@Kyoma ) for providing the mainland Chinapublic-interest speed test service